Skip to content
Open access · CC0 via OpenAlex

Perspective: Time-Restricted Eating Compared with Caloric Restriction: Potential Facilitators and Barriers of Long-Term Weight Loss Maintenance

Sydney O’Connor, Patrick Boyd, Caitlin P. Bailey, Marissa Shams‐White, Tanya Agurs‐Collins, Kara Hall, Jill Reedy, Edward R. Sauter, Susan M. Czajkowski

Advances in Nutrition · 2021 · ▲ 96 citations

Abstract

A growing body of literature examines the potential benefits of a time-based diet strategy referred to as time-restricted eating (TRE). TRE, a type of intermittent fasting, restricts the time of eating to a window of 4-12 h/d but allows ad libitum intake during eating windows. Although TRE diets do not overtly attempt to reduce energy intake, preliminary evidence from small studies suggests that TRE can lead to concomitant reduction in total energy, improvements in metabolic health, and weight loss. Unique features of the TRE diet strategy may facilitate adherence and long-term weight loss maintenance. In this Perspective, we explore the potential multilevel (i.e., biological, behavioral, psychosocial, environmental) facilitators and barriers of TRE for long-term weight loss maintenance in comparison with the more commonly used diet strategy, caloric restriction(definition) (CR). Compared with CR, TRE may facilitate weight loss maintenance by counteracting physiological adaptations to weight loss (biological), allowing for usual dietary preferences to be maintained (behavioral), preserving executive functioning (psychosocial), and enabling individuals to withstand situational pressures to overeat (environmental). However, TRE may also pose unique barriers to weight loss maintenance, particularly for individuals with poor baseline diet quality, internal or social pressures to eat outside selected windows (e.g., grazers), and competing demands that interfere with the scheduling of eating. Future studies of TRE in free-living individuals should consider the multiple levels of influence impacting long-term adherence and weight loss maintenance. Ultimately, TRE could be one strategy in a toolkit of tailored diet strategies to support metabolic health and weight loss maintenance.

◌ CITATION ONLY
Full text is not openly licensed for redistribution here. Read it at the source:

Read at source →

Provenance

Source
OpenAlex
DOI
10.1093/advances/nmaa168
Canonical
link ↗
Fetched
2026-08-01 MST

Cite this

APA
O’Connor, S., Boyd, P., Bailey, C.P., Shams‐White, M., Agurs‐Collins, T., Hall, K., Reedy, J., Sauter, E.R., &amp; Czajkowski, S.M. (2021). Perspective: Time-Restricted Eating Compared with Caloric Restriction: Potential Facilitators and Barriers of Long-Term Weight Loss Maintenance. <em>Advances in Nutrition</em>. https://doi.org/10.1093/advances/nmaa168
Vancouver
O’Connor S, Boyd P, Bailey CP, Shams‐White M, Agurs‐Collins T, Hall K, et al. Perspective: Time-Restricted Eating Compared with Caloric Restriction: Potential Facilitators and Barriers of Long-Term Weight Loss Maintenance. Advances in Nutrition. 2021. doi:10.1093/advances/nmaa168.
BibTeX
@article{sydney2021Perspe, title = {Perspective: Time-Restricted Eating Compared with Caloric Restriction: Potential Facilitators and Barriers of Long-Term Weight Loss Maintenance}, author = {Sydney O’Connor and Patrick Boyd and Caitlin P. Bailey and Marissa Shams‐White and Tanya Agurs‐Collins and Kara Hall and Jill Reedy and Edward R. Sauter and Susan M. Czajkowski}, journal = {Advances in Nutrition}, year = {2021}, doi = {10.1093/advances/nmaa168}, }

Research neighborhood

References, citing works, and semantically nearest findings. Click a node to open it.

Related findings