Citation only
via OpenAlex
Neosis – a paradigm of self-renewal in cancer
Rajmohan Rajaraman, Murali Rajaraman, Selva R Rajaraman, D.L. Guernsey
Cell Biology International · 2005 · ▲ 96 citations
Genomic instability
Telomere attrition
Cellular senescence
Stem-cell exhaustion
Chronic inflammation
Review
Abstract
We recently described a novel form of cell division termed neosis, which appears to be the mode of escape of cells from senescence(definition) and is involved in the neoplastic transformation and progression of tumors (Cancer Biol & Therap 2004;3:207-18). Neosis is a parasexual somatic reduction division and is characterized by (1) DNA damage-induced senescence/mitotic crisis and polyploidization, (2) followed by production of aneuploid daughter cells via nuclear budding, (3) asymmetric cytokinesis and cellularization conferring extended, but, limited mitotic life span to the offspring, and (4) is repeated several times during tumor growth. The immediate neotic progeny are termed the Raju cells, which seem to transiently display stem cell properties. The Raju cells immediately undergo symmetric mitotic division and become mature tumor cells. Exposure of tumor cells to genotoxic agents yields neosis-derived Raju cell progenies that are resistant to genotoxins, thus contributing to the recurrence of drug-resistant tumor growth. Similar events have been described in the literature under different names through several decades, but have been neglected due to the lack of appreciation of the significance of this process in cancer biology. Here we review and interpret the literature in the light of our observations and the recent advances in self-renewal in cancer. Neosis paradigm of self-renewal of cancer growth is consistent with the telomere(definition) attrition, aging and origin of cancer cells after reactivation of telomerase, and constitutes an alternative to the cancer stem cell hypothesis. We summarize the arguments favoring Raju cells and not cancer stem cells, as the source of self-renewal in cancer and present a comprehensive hypothesis of carcinogenesis, encompassing various aspects of cancer biology including senescence, tumor suppressor genes, oncogenes, cell cycle checkpoints, genomic instability, polyploidy and aneuploidy, natural selection, apoptosis, endoapoptosis, development of resistance to radiotherapy and chemotherapy leading tumor progression into malignancy.
◌ CITATION ONLY
Full text is not openly licensed for redistribution here. Read it at the source:
Provenance
- Source
- OpenAlex
- DOI
- 10.1016/j.cellbi.2005.10.003
- Canonical
- link ↗
- Fetched
- 2026-06-02 MST
Cite this
APA
Rajaraman, R., Rajaraman, M., Rajaraman, S.R., & Guernsey, D. (2005). Neosis – a paradigm of self-renewal in cancer. <em>Cell Biology International</em>. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cellbi.2005.10.003
Vancouver
Rajaraman R, Rajaraman M, Rajaraman SR, Guernsey D. Neosis – a paradigm of self-renewal in cancer. Cell Biology International. 2005. doi:10.1016/j.cellbi.2005.10.003.
BibTeX
@article{rajmohan2005Neosis,
title = {Neosis – a paradigm of self-renewal in cancer},
author = {Rajmohan Rajaraman and Murali Rajaraman and Selva R Rajaraman and D.L. Guernsey},
journal = {Cell Biology International},
year = {2005},
doi = {10.1016/j.cellbi.2005.10.003},
}
Research neighborhood
References, citing works, and semantically nearest findings. Click a node to open it.
Related findings
Cancer Research and Treatment 2009
Open access · OA
Significance of Cellular Senescence in Aging and Cancer
Nucleic Acids Research 2007
Open access · OA
Two faces of p53: aging and tumor suppression
Journal of Clinical Investigation 2004
Preprint · OA
When cells get stressed: an integrative view of cellular senescence
Journal of Clinical Investigation 2004
Open access · OA
When cells get stressed: an integrative view of cellular senescence
Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 2007
Citation only
Cross‐Talk between Aging and Cancer
Journal of Orthopaedic Research® 2011
Open access · OA