Skip to content
Open access · CC-BY via OpenAlex

Socioeconomic inequalities in frailty and frailty components among community-dwelling older citizens

Carmen Betsy Franse, Amy van Grieken, Qin Li, René J. F. Melis, Judith Rietjens, Hein Raat

PLoS ONE · 2017 · ▲ 108 citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND: So far, it has not yet been studied whether socioeconomic status is associated with distinct frailty components and for which frailty component this association is the strongest. We aimed to examine the association between socioeconomic status and frailty and frailty components. In addition we assessed the mediating effect of the number of morbidities on the association between socioeconomic status and other frailty components. METHODS: This is a cross-sectional study of pooled data of The Older Persons and Informal Caregivers Survey Minimum DataSet in the Netherlands among community-dwelling persons aged 55 years and older (n = 26,014). Frailty was measured with a validated Frailty Index that consisted of 45 items. The Frailty Index contained six components: morbidities, limitations in activities of daily living (ADL), limitations in instrumental ADL (IADL), health-related quality of life, psychosocial health and self-rated health. Socioeconomic indicators used were education level and neighbourhood socioeconomic status. RESULTS: Persons with primary or secondary education had higher overall frailty and frailty component scores compared to persons with tertiary education (P < .001). Lower education levels were most consistently associated with higher overall frailty, more morbidities and worse self-rated health (P < .05 in all age groups). The strongest association was found between primary education and low psychosocial health for persons aged 55-69 years and more IADL limitations for persons aged 80+ years. Associations between neighborhood socioeconomic status and frailty (components) also showed inequalities, although less strong. The number of morbidities moderately to strongly mediated the association between socioeconomic indicators and other frailty components. CONCLUSION: There are socioeconomic inequalities in frailty and frailty components. Inequalities in frailty, number of morbidities and self-rated health are most consistent across age groups. The number of morbidities a person has play an important role in explaining socioeconomic inequalities in frailty and should be taken into account in the management of frailty.

◌ CITATION ONLY
Full text is not openly licensed for redistribution here. Read it at the source:

Read at source →

Provenance

Source
OpenAlex
DOI
10.1371/journal.pone.0187946
Canonical
link ↗
Fetched
2026-07-25 MST

Cite this

APA
Franse, C.B., Grieken, A.V., Li, Q., Melis, R.J.F., Rietjens, J., &amp; Raat, H. (2017). Socioeconomic inequalities in frailty and frailty components among community-dwelling older citizens. <em>PLoS ONE</em>. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0187946
Vancouver
Franse CB, Grieken AV, Li Q, Melis RJF, Rietjens J, Raat H. Socioeconomic inequalities in frailty and frailty components among community-dwelling older citizens. PLoS ONE. 2017. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0187946.
BibTeX
@article{carmen2017Socioe, title = {Socioeconomic inequalities in frailty and frailty components among community-dwelling older citizens}, author = {Carmen Betsy Franse and Amy van Grieken and Qin Li and René J. F. Melis and Judith Rietjens and Hein Raat}, journal = {PLoS ONE}, year = {2017}, doi = {10.1371/journal.pone.0187946}, }

Research neighborhood

References, citing works, and semantically nearest findings. Click a node to open it.

Related findings