Open access · CC-BY
via OpenAlex
Otolith‐based species identification in the killifish <i>Aphaniops</i> (Teleostei; Cyprinodontiformes; Aphaniidae) using both morphometry and wavelet analysis
Eleni A. Charmpila, Azad Teimori, Bettina Reichenbacher
Acta Zoologica · 2024 · ▲ 10 citations
Abstract
Abstract The killifish genus Aphaniops consists of nine species distributed in Eastern Africa and the Middle East. However, distinguishing these species from each other based on morphological traits is challenging. Here we investigate the utility of otoliths (sagittae) in distinguishing between A. dispar , A. ginaonis , A. hormuzensis , A. kruppi and A. stoliczkanus . Our approach is based on otoliths from 89 specimens and involves (1) otolith morphometrics, following prior recommendations, (2) shape analysis of otolith contours based on discrete wavelet transformation—a novel method in killifish otolith research—and comparative statistical analyses. Both methods reveal significant interspecific variation in the otolith regions of the rostrum, antirostrum and excisura. While method (1) effectively discriminates most species, method (2) struggles to differentiate A. hormuzensis , A. stoliczkanus and A. kruppi . Additionally, both methods encounter challenges in correctly classifying A. hormuzensis due to the high otolith variability of this species in our sample. Possible factors accounting for their variability are environmental fluctuations at the sampled hot sulphuric spring (Khurgo) and potential introgressive hybridization. We conclude that otolith morphometry is a valuable tool for Aphaniops species identification. Furthermore, we found that the distinctiveness of species‐specific otolith traits increases with the divergence age of the species.
◌ CITATION ONLY
Full text is not openly licensed for redistribution here. Read it at the source:
Provenance
- Source
- OpenAlex
- DOI
- 10.1111/azo.12518
- Canonical
- link ↗
- Fetched
- 2026-07-07 MST
Cite this
APA
Charmpila, E.A., Teimori, A., & Reichenbacher, B. (2024). Otolith‐based species identification in the killifish <i>Aphaniops</i> (Teleostei; Cyprinodontiformes; Aphaniidae) using both morphometry and wavelet analysis. <em>Acta Zoologica</em>. https://doi.org/10.1111/azo.12518
Vancouver
Charmpila EA, Teimori A, Reichenbacher B. Otolith‐based species identification in the killifish <i>Aphaniops</i> (Teleostei; Cyprinodontiformes; Aphaniidae) using both morphometry and wavelet analysis. Acta Zoologica. 2024. doi:10.1111/azo.12518.
BibTeX
@article{eleni2024Otolit,
title = {Otolith‐based species identification in the killifish <i>Aphaniops</i> (Teleostei; Cyprinodontiformes; Aphaniidae) using both morphometry and wavelet analysis},
author = {Eleni A. Charmpila and Azad Teimori and Bettina Reichenbacher},
journal = {Acta Zoologica},
year = {2024},
doi = {10.1111/azo.12518},
}
Research neighborhood
References, citing works, and semantically nearest findings. Click a node to open it.
Related findings
Biochemistry (Moscow) 2022
Open access · CC-BY
Multifaceted Nothobranchius
Nature Reviews Disease Primers 2019
Preprint · OA
Chromosome instability syndromes
Comparative Cytogenetics 2016
Open access · CC-BY
Divergent karyotypes of the annual killifish genus Nothobranchius (Cyprinodontiformes, Nothobranchiidae)
Aging 2020
Preprint · CC-BY
ATM is a key driver of NF-κB-dependent DNA-damage-induced senescence, stem cell dysfunction and aging
Communications biology 2025
Open access · OA
More than one species of the naked mole-rat, a new biomedical model.
Nature Communications 2018
Open access · CC-BY