Citation only
via OpenAlex
Metabolic Effects of Carvedilol vs Metoprolol in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus and Hypertension
George L. Bakris, Vivian Andrew Fonseca, Richard E. Katholi, Janet B. McGill, Franz H. Messerli, Robert A. Phillips, Philip Raskin, Jackson T. Wright, Rosemary Oakes, Mary Ann Lukas, Karen M. Anderson, David S.H. Bell, for the GEMINI Investigators
JAMA · 2004 · ▲ 797 citations
Abstract
CONTEXT: Beta-blockers have been shown to decrease cardiovascular risk in patients with hypertension and type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM); however, some components of the metabolic syndrome are worsened by some beta-blockers. OBJECTIVE: To compare the effects of beta-blockers with different pharmacological profiles on glycemic and metabolic control in participants with DM and hypertension receiving renin-angiotensin system (RAS) blockade, in the context of cardiovascular risk factors. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: A randomized, double-blind, parallel-group trial (The Glycemic Effects in Diabetes Mellitus: Carvedilol-Metoprolol Comparison in Hypertensives [GEMINI]) conducted between June 1, 2001, and April 6, 2004, at 205 US sites that compared the effects of carvedilol and metoprolol tartrate on glycemic control. The 1235 participants were aged 36 to 85 years with hypertension (>130/80 mm Hg) and type 2 DM (glycosylated hemoglobin [HbA1c], 6.5%-8.5%) and were receiving RAS blockers. Participants were followed up for 35 weeks. INTERVENTIONS: Participants were randomized to receive a 6.25- to 25-mg dose of carvedilol (n = 498) or 50- to 200-mg dose of metoprolol tartrate (n = 737), each twice daily. Open-label hydrochlorothiazide and a dihydropyridine calcium antagonist were added, if needed, to achieve blood pressure target. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Difference between groups in mean change from baseline HbA1c following 5 months of maintenance therapy. Additional prespecified comparisons included change from baseline HbA1c in individual treatment groups, treatment effect on insulin sensitivity, and microalbuminuria. RESULTS: The 2 groups differed in mean change in HbA1c from baseline (0.13%; 95% confidence interval [CI], -0.22% to -0.04%; P = .004; modified intention-to-treat analysis). The mean (SD) HbA1c increased with metoprolol (0.15% [0.04%]; P<.001) but not carvedilol (0.02% [0.04%]; P = .65). Insulin sensitivity improved with carvedilol (-9.1%; P = .004) but not metoprolol (-2.0%; P = .48); the between-group difference was -7.2% (95% CI, -13.8% to -0.2%; P = .004). Blood pressure was similar between groups. Progression to microalbuminuria was less frequent with carvedilol than with metoprolol (6.4% vs 10.3%; odds ratio, 0.60; 95% CI, 0.36-0.97; P = .04). CONCLUSIONS: Both beta-blockers were well tolerated; use of carvedilol in the presence of RAS blockade did not affect glycemic control and improved some components of the metabolic syndrome relative to metoprolol in participants with DM and hypertension. The effects of the 2 beta-blockers on clinical outcomes need to be compared in long-term clinical trials.
◌ CITATION ONLY
Full text is not openly licensed for redistribution here. Read it at the source:
Provenance
- Source
- OpenAlex
- DOI
- 10.1001/jama.292.18.2227
- Canonical
- link ↗
- Fetched
- 2026-10-20 MST
Cite this
APA
Bakris, G.L., Fonseca, V.A., Katholi, R.E., McGill, J.B., Messerli, F.H., Phillips, R.A., Raskin, P., Wright, J.T., Oakes, R., Lukas, M.A., Anderson, K.M., Bell, D.S., & Investigators, F.T.G. (2004). Metabolic Effects of Carvedilol vs Metoprolol in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus and Hypertension. <em>JAMA</em>. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.292.18.2227
Vancouver
Bakris GL, Fonseca VA, Katholi RE, McGill JB, Messerli FH, Phillips RA, et al. Metabolic Effects of Carvedilol vs Metoprolol in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus and Hypertension. JAMA. 2004. doi:10.1001/jama.292.18.2227.
BibTeX
@article{george2004Metabo,
title = {Metabolic Effects of Carvedilol vs Metoprolol in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus and Hypertension},
author = {George L. Bakris and Vivian Andrew Fonseca and Richard E. Katholi and Janet B. McGill and Franz H. Messerli and Robert A. Phillips and Philip Raskin and Jackson T. Wright and Rosemary Oakes and Mary Ann Lukas and Karen M. Anderson and David S.H. Bell and for the GEMINI Investigators},
journal = {JAMA},
year = {2004},
doi = {10.1001/jama.292.18.2227},
}
Research neighborhood
References, citing works, and semantically nearest findings. Click a node to open it.
Related findings
JAMA Network Open 2024
Open access · CC-BY
A 5:2 Intermittent Fasting Meal Replacement Diet and Glycemic Control for Adults With Diabetes
JAMA Network Open 2023
Open access · CC-BY
Effect of Time-Restricted Eating on Weight Loss in Adults With Type 2 Diabetes
Clinical Epigenetics 2025
Open access · CC-BY
Unveiling the impact of DNA-methylation age acceleration on mortality risk in diabetes and pre-diabetes: insights from the US NHANES program
Aging 2024
Open access · CC-BY
Relationships of depression and antidepressant use with epigenetic age acceleration and all-cause mortality among postmenopausal women
Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2021
Preprint · OA
Intermittent fasting for the prevention of cardiovascular disease
Metabolic Syndrome and Related Disorders 2007
Citation only