Open access · OA
via OpenAlex
Lifespan extension by dietary restriction is not linked to protection against somatic DNA damage in <i>Drosophila melanogaster</i>
Ursula Edman, Ana Maria Garcı́a, Rita A. Busuttil, Dylan J. Sorensen, Martha J. Lundell, Pankaj Kapahi, Jan Vijg
Aging Cell · 2009 · ▲ 38 citations
Abstract
Dietary restriction (DR) has been shown to robustly extend lifespan in multiple species tested so far. The pro-longevity effect of DR is often ascribed to an increase in cellular defense against somatic damage, most notably damage by reactive oxygen species (ROS), considered a major cause of aging. Especially irreversible damage to DNA, the carrier of genetic information, is considered a critical causal factor in aging. Using a recently developed transgenic Drosophila melanogaster model system harboring a lacZ-plasmid construct that can be recovered in E. coli, spontaneous DNA mutation frequency in flies under DR and ad libitum conditions are measured. Three different DR conditions, imposed by manipulating levels of different types of yeast sources, were tested in females and males of two lacZ reporter gene lines. Feeding with the ROS producer paraquat at 1 mM resulted in a rapid accumulation of somatic mutations, indicating that the frequency of mutations at the lacZ locus is a reliable marker for increased oxidative stress. However, none of the DR conditions altered the accumulation of spontaneous mutations with age. These results suggest that the beneficial effects of DR are unlikely to be linked to protection against oxidative somatic DNA damage.
◌ CITATION ONLY
Full text is not openly licensed for redistribution here. Read it at the source:
Provenance
- Source
- OpenAlex
- DOI
- 10.1111/j.1474-9726.2009.00480.x
- Canonical
- link ↗
- Fetched
- 2026-06-30 MST
Cite this
APA
Edman, U., Garcı́a, A.M., Busuttil, R.A., Sorensen, D.J., Lundell, M.J., Kapahi, P., & Vijg, J. (2009). Lifespan extension by dietary restriction is not linked to protection against somatic DNA damage in <i>Drosophila melanogaster</i>. <em>Aging Cell</em>. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1474-9726.2009.00480.x
Vancouver
Edman U, Garcı́a AM, Busuttil RA, Sorensen DJ, Lundell MJ, Kapahi P, et al. Lifespan extension by dietary restriction is not linked to protection against somatic DNA damage in <i>Drosophila melanogaster</i>. Aging Cell. 2009. doi:10.1111/j.1474-9726.2009.00480.x.
BibTeX
@article{ursula2009Lifesp,
title = {Lifespan extension by dietary restriction is not linked to protection against somatic DNA damage in <i>Drosophila melanogaster</i>},
author = {Ursula Edman and Ana Maria Garcı́a and Rita A. Busuttil and Dylan J. Sorensen and Martha J. Lundell and Pankaj Kapahi and Jan Vijg},
journal = {Aging Cell},
year = {2009},
doi = {10.1111/j.1474-9726.2009.00480.x},
}
Research neighborhood
References, citing works, and semantically nearest findings. Click a node to open it.
Related findings
PLoS ONE 2013
Open access · CC-BY
Extension of Drosophila Lifespan by Rhodiola rosea through a Mechanism Independent from Dietary Restriction
Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology 2021
Open access · CC-BY
Beneficial and Detrimental Effects of Reactive Oxygen Species on Lifespan: A Comprehensive Review of Comparative and Experimental Studies
Journal of Cell Science 2008
Citation only
Signaling networks in aging
Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) 2026
Open access · OA
Nitroxide Hormesis in Yeast: 4-Hydroxy-TEMPO Modulates Aging, and Cell Cycle.
International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2019
Open access · CC-BY
Nickel Carcinogenesis Mechanism: DNA Damage
Aging 2012
Open access · CC-BY