Open access · US-GOV
via ClinicalTrials.gov Clinical trial
Injection Site-Based Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial: Efficacy and Safety of Focal Botulinum Toxin Type A Injection for Oral Commissure Ptosis
Authors not listed
Peking University · 2026
Abstract
This multicenter, prospective, randomized parallel-controlled, assessor-blinded clinical trial aims to address the core clinical pain point of lack of high-level evidence and non-standardized operation in injection site selection for BTX-A treatment of oral commissure ptosis. A total of 266 eligible subjects will be randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive either upper DAO or lower DAO BTX-A injection. The study will compare the clinical efficacy, time-effect characteristics and safety profiles of the two regimens, and conduct stratified analysis of treatment response in different patient subtypes. The results will determine the optimal injection site for Chinese population, establish standardized operation specifications, fill the international evidence gap, and provide level I evidence for clinical practice.
◌ CITATION ONLY
Full text is not openly licensed for redistribution here. Read it at the source:
Provenance
- Source
- ClinicalTrials.gov
- Canonical
- link ↗
- Fetched
- 2026-10-15 MST
Cite this
APA
Anonymous. (2026). Injection Site-Based Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial: Efficacy and Safety of Focal Botulinum Toxin Type A Injection for Oral Commissure Ptosis. <em>Peking University</em>. https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT07646886
Vancouver
Anonymous. Injection Site-Based Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial: Efficacy and Safety of Focal Botulinum Toxin Type A Injection for Oral Commissure Ptosis. Peking University. 2026.
BibTeX
@misc{anon2026Inject,
title = {Injection Site-Based Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial: Efficacy and Safety of Focal Botulinum Toxin Type A Injection for Oral Commissure Ptosis},
author = {Anonymous},
journal = {Peking University},
year = {2026},
}
Research neighborhood
References, citing works, and semantically nearest findings. Click a node to open it.
Related findings
Teoxane SA 2019
Open access · US-GOV
A Randomized, Controlled, Double-blinded, Within-subject (Split-face), Multicenter, Prospective Clinical Study to Compare the Level of Pain Using the Dermal Filler RHA® 4 Formulated With Two Different Anesthetics in the Treatment of Nasolabial Folds
Muhammed Mustafa Demirok 2026
Open access · US-GOV
Enhancing the Durability of Thread-Assisted Brow Suspension Through Upper Blepharoplasty-Assisted Retaining Ligament Release: A Hybrid Surgical Approach for Long-Term Brow Elevation
Orient Europharma Co., Ltd. 2023
Open access · US-GOV
Evaluate the Effect of Dietary Supplement Combined Supervised Exercise on Physical Performance and Body Composition Among Patients With Sarcopenia and Severe Sarcopenia Comorbid With COPD or ILD: A Prospective, Multi-center Cohort Study
Teoxane SA 2019
Open access · US-GOV
A Randomized, Controlled, Double-blinded, Within-subject (Split-face), Multicenter, Prospective Clinical Study to Compare the Level of Pain Using the Dermal Filler RHA® Redensity Formulated With Two Different Anesthetics in the Treatment of Perioral Rhytids
Teoxane SA 2024
Open access · US-GOV
A Randomized, Controlled, Double-blinded, Within-subject (Split-face), Multicenter, Prospective Clinical Study to Compare the Level of Pain Using the Dermal Filler RHA® Redensity Formulated With Two Different Anesthetics in the Treatment of Perioral Rhytids
Istituto Auxologico Italiano 2023
Open access · US-GOV