Open access · US-GOV
via ClinicalTrials.gov Clinical trial
A Randomized, Controlled, Double-blinded, Within-subject (Split-face), Multicenter, Prospective Clinical Study to Compare the Level of Pain Using the Dermal Filler RHA® 4 Formulated With Two Different Anesthetics in the Treatment of Nasolabial Folds
Authors not listed
Teoxane SA · 2019
Abstract
This is a randomized, controlled, double-blinded, within-subject (split-face), multicenter, prospective study to investigate whether RHA® 4 with New Anesthetic Agent is non-inferior to RHA® 4 (with lidocaine) in terms of injection site pain felt by the subject during injection.
At screening, the Treating Investigator (TI) evaluated subjects' NLF severity (using the Wrinkle Severity Rating Scale; WSRS) to confirm eligibility and to establish a pre-treatment score for assessing aesthetic improvement.
At Visit 1, RHA® 4 With New Anesthetic Agent was administered in a random sequence (first or second injection) and side of the face (left or right) and RHA® 4 with lidocaine was administered to the other side. Study subjects and the TI injecting study devices were blinded.
Immediately after injection of each side, subjects rated injection site pain experienced during injection using a 100 mm Visual Analog Scale (VAS). Injection site pain in each side of the face was also assessed at 15, 30, 45 and 60 minutes post-injection.
Safety evaluation consisted of AE assessments, a 30-day CTR (Common Treatment Response) diary and a follow-up call performed by the study site at 72 hours after injection.
Subjects attended Visit 2 (30 days post-injection) where efficacy and safety assessments will be conducted. Subjects who present with an unresolved clinically significant device related AE at Visit 2 received the optional follow-up phone call no later than 30 days after Visit 2. If the clinically significant AE remained unresolved, the Investigator requested that the subject attended the optional in-clinic follow-up visit (i.e., Visit 3) within 5 working days. Follow-up of the clinically significant AE continued until the AE was resolved or the TI determines that additional follow-up was not necessary.
◌ CITATION ONLY
Full text is not openly licensed for redistribution here. Read it at the source:
Provenance
- Source
- ClinicalTrials.gov
- Canonical
- link ↗
- Fetched
- 2026-05-31 MST
Cite this
APA
Anonymous. (2019). A Randomized, Controlled, Double-blinded, Within-subject (Split-face), Multicenter, Prospective Clinical Study to Compare the Level of Pain Using the Dermal Filler RHA® 4 Formulated With Two Different Anesthetics in the Treatment of Nasolabial Folds. <em>Teoxane SA</em>. https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04087395
Vancouver
Anonymous. A Randomized, Controlled, Double-blinded, Within-subject (Split-face), Multicenter, Prospective Clinical Study to Compare the Level of Pain Using the Dermal Filler RHA® 4 Formulated With Two Different Anesthetics in the Treatment of Nasolabial Folds. Teoxane SA. 2019.
BibTeX
@misc{anon2019ARando,
title = {A Randomized, Controlled, Double-blinded, Within-subject (Split-face), Multicenter, Prospective Clinical Study to Compare the Level of Pain Using the Dermal Filler RHA® 4 Formulated With Two Different Anesthetics in the Treatment of Nasolabial Folds},
author = {Anonymous},
journal = {Teoxane SA},
year = {2019},
}
Research neighborhood
References, citing works, and semantically nearest findings. Click a node to open it.
Related findings
Teoxane SA 2019
Open access · US-GOV
A Randomized, Controlled, Double-blinded, Within-subject (Split-face), Multicenter, Prospective Clinical Study to Compare the Level of Pain Using the Dermal Filler RHA® Redensity Formulated With Two Different Anesthetics in the Treatment of Perioral Rhytids
Teoxane SA 2024
Open access · US-GOV
A Randomized, Controlled, Double-blinded, Within-subject (Split-face), Multicenter, Prospective Clinical Study to Compare the Level of Pain Using the Dermal Filler RHA® Redensity Formulated With Two Different Anesthetics in the Treatment of Perioral Rhytids
Teoxane SA 2021
Open access · US-GOV
A Randomized, Controlled, Single-blinded, Within-subject (Split-face), Multicenter, Prospective Clinical Study to Evaluate the Effectiveness and Safety of Using the Dermal Filler RHA®4 Injected With a Cannula or With a Sharp Needle for the Treatment of Moderate to Severe Nasolabial Folds
Teoxane SA 2021
Open access · US-GOV
A Prospective, Multicentric, Open-labelled, Interventional Study to Assess Skin Beautification by Treating Fine Lines in the Neck, Perioral and Smiling Lines Areas With TEOSYAL RHA® 1
Kiomed Pharma 2025
Open access · US-GOV
Prospective, Multicentric, Open Label Clinical Investigation to Evaluate Performance and Safety of Injectable KIO017 Device Range for Facial Tissue Filling
Laboratoires Vivacy 2021
Open access · US-GOV