Skip to content
Open access · CC-BY via OpenAlex

Horizons in the evolution of aging

Thomas Flatt, Linda Partridge

BMC Biology · 2018 · ▲ 263 citations

Abstract

Between the 1930s and 50s, evolutionary biologists developed a successful theory of why organisms age, firmly rooted in population genetic principles. By the 1980s the evolution of aging had a secure experimental basis. Since the force of selection declines with age, aging evolves due to mutation accumulation or a benefit to fitness early in life. Here we review major insights and challenges that have emerged over the last 35 years: selection does not always necessarily decline with age; higher extrinsic (i.e., environmentally caused) mortality does not always accelerate aging; conserved pathways control aging rate; senescence(definition) patterns are more diverse than previously thought; aging is not universal; trade-offs involving lifespan can be 'broken'; aging might be 'druggable'; and human life expectancy continues to rise but compressing late-life morbidity remains a pressing challenge.

◌ CITATION ONLY
Full text is not openly licensed for redistribution here. Read it at the source:

Read at source →

Provenance

Source
OpenAlex
DOI
10.1186/s12915-018-0562-z
Canonical
link ↗
Fetched
2026-06-13 MST

Cite this

APA
Flatt, T., &amp; Partridge, L. (2018). Horizons in the evolution of aging. <em>BMC Biology</em>. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12915-018-0562-z
Vancouver
Flatt T, Partridge L. Horizons in the evolution of aging. BMC Biology. 2018. doi:10.1186/s12915-018-0562-z.
BibTeX
@article{thomas2018Horizo, title = {Horizons in the evolution of aging}, author = {Thomas Flatt and Linda Partridge}, journal = {BMC Biology}, year = {2018}, doi = {10.1186/s12915-018-0562-z}, }

Research neighborhood

References, citing works, and semantically nearest findings. Click a node to open it.

Related findings