Skip to content
Preprint · OA via OpenAlex

Faculty Opinions recommendation of Impact of caloric restriction on health and survival in rhesus monkeys from the NIA study.

Amira Klip, Nicolas J. Pillon

Faculty Opinions – Post-Publication Peer Review of the Biomedical Literature · 2012

Abstract

Life extension by calorie restriction (CR) has been widely reported in a variety of species and remains on the forefront of anti-aging intervention studies.We report healthspan(definition) and survival effects of CR from a 23-year study in rhesus macaques conducted at the National Institute on Aging (NIA).CR initiated at older ages did not increase survival relative to Controls; however, CR monkeys demonstrated an improved metabolic profile and may have less oxidative stress as indicated by plasma isoprostane levels.When initiated in young monkeys, there was a trend (p=0.06) for a delay in age-associated disease onset in CR monkeys; but again, survival curves were not improved, in contrast to another study reported in the literature.This suggests that the effects of CR in a long-lived animal are complex and likely dependent on a variety of environmental, nutritional, and genetic factors.Calorie restriction (CR) is often reported as the most robust non-genetic mechanism to extend lifespan and healthspan.Typically involving reductions of 10-40% in intake of a nutritious diet, the CR paradigm is frequently used as a tool to understand mechanisms that contribute to aging and age-associated diseases.In addition to lifespan, CR has also been reported to delay or prevent the occurrence of many chronic diseases in a variety of animals.

◌ CITATION ONLY
Full text is not openly licensed for redistribution here. Read it at the source:

Read at source →

Provenance

Source
OpenAlex
DOI
10.3410/f.717953971.793461957
Canonical
link ↗
Fetched
2026-10-08 MST

Cite this

APA
Klip, A., &amp; Pillon, N.J. (2012). Faculty Opinions recommendation of Impact of caloric restriction on health and survival in rhesus monkeys from the NIA study. <em>Faculty Opinions – Post-Publication Peer Review of the Biomedical Literature</em>. https://doi.org/10.3410/f.717953971.793461957
Vancouver
Klip A, Pillon NJ. Faculty Opinions recommendation of Impact of caloric restriction on health and survival in rhesus monkeys from the NIA study. Faculty Opinions – Post-Publication Peer Review of the Biomedical Literature. 2012. doi:10.3410/f.717953971.793461957.
BibTeX
@unpublished{amira2012Facult, title = {Faculty Opinions recommendation of Impact of caloric restriction on health and survival in rhesus monkeys from the NIA study.}, author = {Amira Klip and Nicolas J. Pillon}, journal = {Faculty Opinions – Post-Publication Peer Review of the Biomedical Literature}, year = {2012}, doi = {10.3410/f.717953971.793461957}, }

Research neighborhood

References, citing works, and semantically nearest findings. Click a node to open it.

Related findings