Skip to content
Preprint · CC-BY via OpenAlex

Comparing Fourteen Consensus Biomarkers of Aging: Epigenetic Pace of Aging as the Strongest Predictor of Mortality in BASE-II

Valentin Max Vetter, Marit Philine Junge, Christian Andre Drevon, Thomas E. Gundersen, Jan Homann, Christina M. Lill, Ulman Lindenberger, Graham Pawelec, Lars Bertram, Denis Gerstorf, Ilja Demuth

medRxiv · 2025 · ▲ 1 citations

Abstract

Abstract In many countries, lifespan has been increasing faster than healthspan(definition), leading to more years spent with late-life disease and highlighting the need for reliable biomarkers to measure biological aging and to plan personalized interventions to extend healthspan. We used data from the Berlin Aging Study II (BASE-II, 60-80 years of age at baseline, average follow-up 7.4±1.5 years, range 3.9-10.4, n=1,083) to compare 14 biomarkers of aging recently consented by an expert panel for the use as outcome measures in intervention studies: Insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-1), growth-differentiating factor-15 (DNA methylation derived, DNAmGDF15), high sensitivity C-reactive protein (CRP), interleukin-6 (IL 6), muscle mass, muscle strength, hand grip strength (HGS), Timed-Up-and-Go (TUG), gait speed, standing balance test, frailty index (FI), cognitive health, blood pressure, and epigenetic age (DunedinPACE). Cox proportional hazard regression analyses were performed to investigate the predictive role for all-cause mortality and to identify subgroups of the three most frequent causes of death observed in BASE-II. Results were adjusted for age, sex, lifestyle factors, and genetic ancestry. In adjusted models of all-cause mortality, HGS, IL 6, standing balance, cognitive health, and epigenetic age (DunedinPACE) significantly predicted mortality, with the epigenetic age (DunedinPACE) emerging as the strongest predictor. In contrast, CRP, Gait Speed, IGF-1, blood pressure, muscle mass, DNAmGDF15, FI and TUG were not associated with mortality. These results were corroborated in subgroup analyses stratified by cause of death. Feature selection identified a minimal biomarker set comprising muscle mass, standing balance, and epigenetic age (DunedinPACE) that predicted mortality with nearly the same discriminative accuracy (C-index = 0.63) as the full model including all biomarkers (C-index = 0.65).

◌ CITATION ONLY
Full text is not openly licensed for redistribution here. Read it at the source:

Read at source →

Provenance

Source
OpenAlex
DOI
10.1101/2025.11.20.25340648
Canonical
link ↗
Fetched
2026-10-16 MST

Cite this

APA
Vetter, V.M., Junge, M.P., Drevon, C.A., Gundersen, T.E., Homann, J., Lill, C.M., Lindenberger, U., Pawelec, G., Bertram, L., Gerstorf, D., &amp; Demuth, I. (2025). Comparing Fourteen Consensus Biomarkers of Aging: Epigenetic Pace of Aging as the Strongest Predictor of Mortality in BASE-II. <em>medRxiv</em>. https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.11.20.25340648
Vancouver
Vetter VM, Junge MP, Drevon CA, Gundersen TE, Homann J, Lill CM, et al. Comparing Fourteen Consensus Biomarkers of Aging: Epigenetic Pace of Aging as the Strongest Predictor of Mortality in BASE-II. medRxiv. 2025. doi:10.1101/2025.11.20.25340648.
BibTeX
@unpublished{valentin2025Compar, title = {Comparing Fourteen Consensus Biomarkers of Aging: Epigenetic Pace of Aging as the Strongest Predictor of Mortality in BASE-II}, author = {Valentin Max Vetter and Marit Philine Junge and Christian Andre Drevon and Thomas E. Gundersen and Jan Homann and Christina M. Lill and Ulman Lindenberger and Graham Pawelec and Lars Bertram and Denis Gerstorf and Ilja Demuth}, journal = {medRxiv}, year = {2025}, doi = {10.1101/2025.11.20.25340648}, }

Research neighborhood

References, citing works, and semantically nearest findings. Click a node to open it.

Related findings