Open access · CC-BY
via OpenAlex
Comparative analysis of mouse strains for in vivo induction of reprogramming factors
Sara Picó, Alba Vílchez-Acosta, João Agostinho de Sousa, María del Carmen Lapo Maza, Calida Mrabti, Alberto Parras, Gabriela Desdín-Micó, Céline Yacoub Maroun, Clémence Branchina, Ferdinand von Meyenn, Alejandro Ocampo
Cell Reports · 2025 · ▲ 4 citations
Abstract
In vivo reprogramming through the forced expression of Oct4, Sox2, Klf4, and c-Myc (OSKM) has demonstrated great potential for reversing age-associated phenotypes. However, continuous in vivo OSKM expression has raised safety concerns due to loss of cell identity, decrease in body weight, and premature death. Although cyclic short-term or targeted expression of the reprogramming factors can mitigate some of these detrimental effects, systemic rejuvenation of wild-type mice has remained elusive. To improve the fundamental understanding of in vivo reprogramming, we conduct a comparative analysis of various reprogrammable mouse strains across multiple tissues and organs. In addition, we develop reprogrammable mouse strains by avoiding OSKM expression in specific organs or implementing expression approaches within specific cells, thereby offering safer strategies to induce in vivo reprogramming. We hope that these tools will become valuable resources for future research in this field of research with potential implications to human health.
◌ CITATION ONLY
Full text is not openly licensed for redistribution here. Read it at the source:
Provenance
- Source
- OpenAlex
- DOI
- 10.1016/j.celrep.2025.115879
- Canonical
- link ↗
- Fetched
- 2026-06-18 MST
Cite this
APA
Picó, S., Vílchez-Acosta, A., Sousa, J.A.D., Maza, M.D.C.L., Mrabti, C., Parras, A., Desdín-Micó, G., Maroun, C.Y., Branchina, C., Meyenn, F.V., & Ocampo, A. (2025). Comparative analysis of mouse strains for in vivo induction of reprogramming factors. <em>Cell Reports</em>. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2025.115879
Vancouver
Picó S, Vílchez-Acosta A, Sousa JAD, Maza MDCL, Mrabti C, Parras A, et al. Comparative analysis of mouse strains for in vivo induction of reprogramming factors. Cell Reports. 2025. doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2025.115879.
BibTeX
@article{sara2025Compar,
title = {Comparative analysis of mouse strains for in vivo induction of reprogramming factors},
author = {Sara Picó and Alba Vílchez-Acosta and João Agostinho de Sousa and María del Carmen Lapo Maza and Calida Mrabti and Alberto Parras and Gabriela Desdín-Micó and Céline Yacoub Maroun and Clémence Branchina and Ferdinand von Meyenn and Alejandro Ocampo},
journal = {Cell Reports},
year = {2025},
doi = {10.1016/j.celrep.2025.115879},
}
Research neighborhood
References, citing works, and semantically nearest findings. Click a node to open it.
Related findings
bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) 2022
Preprint · CC-BY
In vivo reprogramming leads to premature death due to hepatic and intestinal failure
Regenerative Therapy 2024
Open access · CC-BY
Research of in vivo reprogramming toward clinical applications in regenerative medicine: A concise review
Nature Communications 2021
Open access · CC-BY
DMRT1-mediated reprogramming drives development of cancer resembling human germ cell tumors with features of totipotency
Trends in Cell Biology 2023
Open access · CC-BY
Cellular plasticity in reprogramming, rejuvenation and tumorigenesis: a pioneer TF perspective
bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) 2021
Preprint · OA
Partial reprogramming restores youthful gene expression through transient suppression of cell identity
Advanced Therapeutics 2020
Open access · CC-BY