Open access · OA
via OpenAlex
Biomarkers improve mortality prediction by prognostic scales in community-acquired pneumonia
Rosario Menéndez, R Martinez, S. Reyes, José Mensa, Xavier Filella, María Ángeles Marcos, A. Martinez, Cristina Esquinas, Paula Ramírez, Antoni Torres
Thorax · 2009 · ▲ 246 citations
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Prognostic scales provide a useful tool to predict mortality in community-acquired pneumonia (CAP). However, the inflammatory response of the host, crucial in resolution and outcome, is not included in the prognostic scales. METHODS: The aim of this study was to investigate whether information about the initial inflammatory cytokine profile and markers increases the accuracy of prognostic scales to predict 30-day mortality. To this aim, a prospective cohort study in two tertiary care hospitals was designed. Procalcitonin (PCT), C-reactive protein (CRP) and the systemic cytokines tumour necrosis factor alpha (TNFalpha) and interleukins IL6, IL8 and IL10 were measured at admission. Initial severity was assessed by PSI (Pneumonia Severity Index), CURB65 (Confusion, Urea nitrogen, Respiratory rate, Blood pressure, > or = 65 years of age) and CRB65 (Confusion, Respiratory rate, Blood pressure, > or = 65 years of age) scales. A total of 453 hospitalised CAP patients were included. RESULTS: The 36 patients who died (7.8%) had significantly increased levels of IL6, IL8, PCT and CRP. In regression logistic analyses, high levels of CRP and IL6 showed an independent predictive value for predicting 30-day mortality, after adjustment for prognostic scales. Adding CRP to PSI significantly increased the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) from 0.80 to 0.85, that of CURB65 from 0.82 to 0.85 and that of CRB65 from 0.79 to 0.85. Adding IL6 or PCT values to CRP did not significantly increase the AUC of any scale. When using two scales (PSI and CURB65/CRB65) and CRP simultaneously the AUC was 0.88. CONCLUSIONS: Adding CRP levels to PSI, CURB65 and CRB65 scales improves the 30-day mortality prediction. The highest predictive value is reached with a combination of two scales and CRP. Further validation of that improvement is needed.
◌ CITATION ONLY
Full text is not openly licensed for redistribution here. Read it at the source:
Provenance
- Source
- OpenAlex
- DOI
- 10.1136/thx.2008.105312
- Canonical
- link ↗
- Fetched
- 2026-07-28 MST
Cite this
APA
Menéndez, R., Martinez, R., Reyes, S., Mensa, J., Filella, X., Marcos, M.�., Martinez, A., Esquinas, C., Ramírez, P., & Torres, A. (2009). Biomarkers improve mortality prediction by prognostic scales in community-acquired pneumonia. <em>Thorax</em>. https://doi.org/10.1136/thx.2008.105312
Vancouver
Menéndez R, Martinez R, Reyes S, Mensa J, Filella X, Marcos M�, et al. Biomarkers improve mortality prediction by prognostic scales in community-acquired pneumonia. Thorax. 2009. doi:10.1136/thx.2008.105312.
BibTeX
@article{rosario2009Biomar,
title = {Biomarkers improve mortality prediction by prognostic scales in community-acquired pneumonia},
author = {Rosario Menéndez and R Martinez and S. Reyes and José Mensa and Xavier Filella and María Ángeles Marcos and A. Martinez and Cristina Esquinas and Paula Ramírez and Antoni Torres},
journal = {Thorax},
year = {2009},
doi = {10.1136/thx.2008.105312},
}
Research neighborhood
References, citing works, and semantically nearest findings. Click a node to open it.
Related findings
BMC Geriatrics 2017
Open access · CC-BY
Biological age as a useful index to predict seventeen-year survival and mortality in Koreans
Obesity Research & Clinical Practice 2024
Open access · CC-BY
Associations between body mass index, biological age and frailty in the critically ill
Clinical Epigenetics 2019
Open access · CC-BY
Leisure-time physical activity and DNA methylation age—a twin study
Frontiers in Genetics 2016
Open access · CC-BY
Simplified Assay for Epigenetic Age Estimation in Whole Blood of Adults
Clinical Epigenetics 2018
Open access · CC-BY
DNA methylation and the epigenetic clock in relation to physical frailty in older people: the Lothian Birth Cohort 1936
Clinical Science 2007
Citation only