Open access · CC-BY
via OpenAlex
ATM, ATR and DNA-PKcs kinases—the lessons from the mouse models: inhibition ≠ deletion
Cell & Bioscience · 2020 · ▲ 218 citations
Abstract
Abstract DNA damage, especially DNA double strand breaks (DSBs) and replication stress, activates a complex post-translational network termed DNA damage response (DDR). Our review focuses on three PI3-kinase related protein kinases—ATM, ATR and DNA-PKcs, which situate at the apex of the mammalian DDR. They are recruited to and activated at the DNA damage sites by their respective sensor protein complexes—MRE11/RAD50/NBS1 for ATM, RPA/ATRIP for ATR and KU70–KU80/86 (XRCC6/XRCC5) for DNA-PKcs. Upon activation, ATM, ATR and DNA-PKcs phosphorylate a large number of partially overlapping substrates to promote efficient and accurate DNA repair and to coordinate DNA repair with other DNA metabolic events ( e.g. , transcription, replication and mitosis). At the organism level, robust DDR is critical for normal development, aging, stem cell maintenance and regeneration, and physiological genomic rearrangements in lymphocytes and germ cells. In addition to endogenous damage, oncogene-induced replication stresses and genotoxic chemotherapies also activate DDR. On one hand, DDR factors suppress genomic instability to prevent malignant transformation. On the other hand, targeting DDR enhances the therapeutic effects of anti-cancer chemotherapy, which led to the development of specific kinase inhibitors for ATM, ATR and DNA-PKcs. Using mouse models expressing kinase dead ATM, ATR and DNA-PKcs, an unexpected structural function of these kinases was revealed, where the expression of catalytically inactive kinases causes more genomic instability than the loss of the proteins themselves. The spectrum of genomic instabilities and physiological consequences are unique for each kinase and depends on their activating complexes, suggesting a model in which the catalysis is coupled with DNA/chromatin release and catalytic inhibition leads to the persistence of the kinases at the DNA lesion, which in turn affects repair pathway choice and outcomes. Here we discuss the experimental evidences supporting this mode of action and their implications in the design and use of specific kinase inhibitors for ATM, ATR and DNA-PKcs for cancer therapy.
◌ CITATION ONLY
Full text is not openly licensed for redistribution here. Read it at the source:
Provenance
- Source
- OpenAlex
- DOI
- 10.1186/s13578-020-0376-x
- Canonical
- link ↗
- Fetched
- 2026-07-16 MST
Cite this
APA
Menolfi, D., & Zha, S. (2020). ATM, ATR and DNA-PKcs kinases—the lessons from the mouse models: inhibition ≠ deletion. <em>Cell & Bioscience</em>. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13578-020-0376-x
Vancouver
Menolfi D, Zha S. ATM, ATR and DNA-PKcs kinases—the lessons from the mouse models: inhibition ≠ deletion. Cell & Bioscience. 2020. doi:10.1186/s13578-020-0376-x.
BibTeX
@article{demis2020ATMATR,
title = {ATM, ATR and DNA-PKcs kinases—the lessons from the mouse models: inhibition ≠ deletion},
author = {Demis Menolfi and Shan Zha},
journal = {Cell & Bioscience},
year = {2020},
doi = {10.1186/s13578-020-0376-x},
}
Research neighborhood
References, citing works, and semantically nearest findings. Click a node to open it.
Related findings
Annual Review of Biochemistry 2015
Open access · OA
Mechanisms of ATM Activation
Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Biology 2013
Preprint · OA
DNA Damage Sensing by the ATM and ATR Kinases
PLoS Genetics 2017
Open access · CC-BY
The homeodomain-interacting protein kinase HPK-1 preserves protein homeostasis and longevity through master regulatory control of the HSF-1 chaperone network and TORC1-restricted autophagy in Caenorhabditis elegans
Frontiers in Genetics 2020
Open access · CC-BY
DNA-PKcs: A Multi-Faceted Player in DNA Damage Response
Molecular Cancer Research 2008
Open access · OA
DNA Damage Responses: Mechanisms and Roles in Human Disease
Journal of Biological Chemistry 2016
Open access · CC-BY