Skip to content
Open access · CC-BY via OpenAlex

Age-related frailty and its association with biological markers of ageing

Arnold Mitnitski, Joanna Collerton, Carmen Martín-Ruiz, Carol Jagger, Thomas von Zglinicki, Kenneth Rockwood, Thomas B. L. Kirkwood

BMC Medicine · 2015 · ▲ 294 citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The relationship between age-related frailty and the underlying processes that drive changes in health is currently unclear. Considered individually, most blood biomarkers show only weak relationships with frailty and ageing. Here, we examined whether a biomarker-based frailty index (FI-B) allowed examination of their collective effect in predicting mortality compared with individual biomarkers, a clinical deficits frailty index (FI-CD), and the Fried frailty phenotype. METHODS: We analyzed baseline data and up to 7-year mortality in the Newcastle 85+ Study (n = 845; mean age 85.5). The FI-B combined 40 biomarkers of cellular ageing, inflammation, haematology, and immunosenescence. The Kaplan-Meier estimator was used to stratify participants into FI-B risk strata. Stability of the risk estimates for the FI-B was assessed using iterative, random subsampling of the 40 FI-B items. Predictive validity was tested using Cox proportional hazards analysis and discriminative ability by the area under receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. RESULTS: The mean FI-B was 0.35 (SD, 0.08), higher than the mean FI-CD (0.22; SD, 0.12); no participant had an FI-B score <0.12. Higher values of each FI were associated with higher mortality risk. In a sex-adjusted model, each one percent increase in the FI-B increased the hazard ratio by 5.4 % (HR, 1.05; CI, 1.04-1.06). The FI-B was more powerful for mortality prediction than any individual biomarker and was robust to biomarker substitution. The ROC analysis showed moderate discriminative ability for 7-year mortality (AUC for FI-CD = 0.71 and AUC for FI-B = 0.66). No individual biomarker's AUC exceeded 0.61. The AUC for combined FI-CD/FI-B was 0.75. CONCLUSIONS: Many biological processes are implicated in ageing. The systemic effects of these processes can be elucidated using the frailty index approach, which showed here that subclinical deficits increased the risk of death. In the future, blood biomarkers may indicate the nature of the underlying causal deficits leading to age-related frailty, thereby helping to expose targets for early preventative interventions.

◌ CITATION ONLY
Full text is not openly licensed for redistribution here. Read it at the source:

Read at source →

Provenance

Source
OpenAlex
DOI
10.1186/s12916-015-0400-x
Canonical
link ↗
Fetched
2026-07-25 MST

Cite this

APA
Mitnitski, A., Collerton, J., Martín-Ruiz, C., Jagger, C., Zglinicki, T.V., Rockwood, K., &amp; Kirkwood, T.B.L. (2015). Age-related frailty and its association with biological markers of ageing. <em>BMC Medicine</em>. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-015-0400-x
Vancouver
Mitnitski A, Collerton J, Martín-Ruiz C, Jagger C, Zglinicki TV, Rockwood K, et al. Age-related frailty and its association with biological markers of ageing. BMC Medicine. 2015. doi:10.1186/s12916-015-0400-x.
BibTeX
@article{arnold2015Agerel, title = {Age-related frailty and its association with biological markers of ageing}, author = {Arnold Mitnitski and Joanna Collerton and Carmen Martín-Ruiz and Carol Jagger and Thomas von Zglinicki and Kenneth Rockwood and Thomas B. L. Kirkwood}, journal = {BMC Medicine}, year = {2015}, doi = {10.1186/s12916-015-0400-x}, }

Research neighborhood

References, citing works, and semantically nearest findings. Click a node to open it.

Related findings