Open access · US-GOV
via ClinicalTrials.gov Clinical trial
A Randomized, Split-Hand, Subject-Blinded Study Comparing Pain, Safety and Effectiveness of Restylane Skinboosters Vital Lidocaine and Restylane Vital Without Lidocaine for Improved Appearance of the Dorsal Hand in Chinese Subjects
Authors not listed
Galderma R&D · 2024
Abstract
This is a randomized, multi-center, split-hand, subject-blinded study comparing pain, safety and effectiveness of Restylane Skinboosters Vital Lidocaine and Restylane Vital without lidocaine for improving appearance of the dorsal hands in Chinese subjects.
◌ CITATION ONLY
Full text is not openly licensed for redistribution here. Read it at the source:
Provenance
- Source
- ClinicalTrials.gov
- Canonical
- link ↗
- Fetched
- 2026-10-27 MST
Cite this
APA
Anonymous. (2024). A Randomized, Split-Hand, Subject-Blinded Study Comparing Pain, Safety and Effectiveness of Restylane Skinboosters Vital Lidocaine and Restylane Vital Without Lidocaine for Improved Appearance of the Dorsal Hand in Chinese Subjects. <em>Galderma R&D</em>. https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT06372782
Vancouver
Anonymous. A Randomized, Split-Hand, Subject-Blinded Study Comparing Pain, Safety and Effectiveness of Restylane Skinboosters Vital Lidocaine and Restylane Vital Without Lidocaine for Improved Appearance of the Dorsal Hand in Chinese Subjects. Galderma R&D. 2024.
BibTeX
@misc{anon2024ARando,
title = {A Randomized, Split-Hand, Subject-Blinded Study Comparing Pain, Safety and Effectiveness of Restylane Skinboosters Vital Lidocaine and Restylane Vital Without Lidocaine for Improved Appearance of the Dorsal Hand in Chinese Subjects},
author = {Anonymous},
journal = {Galderma R&D},
year = {2024},
}
Research neighborhood
References, citing works, and semantically nearest findings. Click a node to open it.
Related findings
Laboratoires Vivacy 2021
Open access · US-GOV
A Prospective, Triple Blinded, Randomized, Controlled Clinical Study of the Effectiveness and Safety of STYLAGE® M LIDOCAINE Versus STYLAGE® M in Filling Nasolabial Folds
Laboratoires Vivacy 2021
Open access · US-GOV
A Controlled, Prospective, Randomized, Multi-Center, Subject and Evaluator-Blinded Study of the Safety and Effectiveness of STYLAGE® L Versus Restylane® for Correction of Moderate and Severe Nasolabial Folds in Chinese Adults
China-Japan Friendship Hospital 2017
Open access · US-GOV
A Multi-centre Real-world Non-interventional Observational Study to Evaluate Effectiveness and Safety of Surgeries in the Chinese Early-stage Patients With Non-small Cell Lung Cancer
Blood Reviews 2011
Preprint · OA
Telomere biology in hematopoiesis and stem cell transplantation
Teoxane SA 2024
Open access · US-GOV
A Randomized, Controlled, Double-blinded, Within-subject (Split-face), Multicenter, Prospective Clinical Study to Compare the Level of Pain Using the Dermal Filler RHA® Redensity Formulated With Two Different Anesthetics in the Treatment of Perioral Rhytids
Oklahoma State University Center for Health Sciences 2007
Open access · US-GOV