Skip to content
Open access · US-GOV via ClinicalTrials.gov Clinical trial

A Randomized, Split-Hand, Subject-Blinded Study Comparing Pain, Safety and Effectiveness of Restylane Skinboosters Vital Lidocaine and Restylane Vital Without Lidocaine for Improved Appearance of the Dorsal Hand in Chinese Subjects

Authors not listed

Galderma R&D · 2024

Abstract

This is a randomized, multi-center, split-hand, subject-blinded study comparing pain, safety and effectiveness of Restylane Skinboosters Vital Lidocaine and Restylane Vital without lidocaine for improving appearance of the dorsal hands in Chinese subjects.

◌ CITATION ONLY
Full text is not openly licensed for redistribution here. Read it at the source:

Read at source →

Provenance

Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Canonical
link ↗
Fetched
2026-10-27 MST

Cite this

APA
Anonymous. (2024). A Randomized, Split-Hand, Subject-Blinded Study Comparing Pain, Safety and Effectiveness of Restylane Skinboosters Vital Lidocaine and Restylane Vital Without Lidocaine for Improved Appearance of the Dorsal Hand in Chinese Subjects. <em>Galderma R&D</em>. https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT06372782
Vancouver
Anonymous. A Randomized, Split-Hand, Subject-Blinded Study Comparing Pain, Safety and Effectiveness of Restylane Skinboosters Vital Lidocaine and Restylane Vital Without Lidocaine for Improved Appearance of the Dorsal Hand in Chinese Subjects. Galderma R&D. 2024.
BibTeX
@misc{anon2024ARando, title = {A Randomized, Split-Hand, Subject-Blinded Study Comparing Pain, Safety and Effectiveness of Restylane Skinboosters Vital Lidocaine and Restylane Vital Without Lidocaine for Improved Appearance of the Dorsal Hand in Chinese Subjects}, author = {Anonymous}, journal = {Galderma R&D}, year = {2024}, }

Research neighborhood

References, citing works, and semantically nearest findings. Click a node to open it.

Related findings