Open access · US-GOV via ClinicalTrials.gov Clinical trial

A Controlled, Prospective, Randomized, Multi-Center, Subject and Evaluator-Blinded Study of the Safety and Effectiveness of STYLAGE® L Versus Restylane® for Correction of Moderate and Severe Nasolabial Folds in Chinese Adults

Authors not listed

Laboratoires Vivacy · 2021

Dysbiosis Human Randomized controlled trial

＋ Sign in to save

Abstract

This is a safety and efficacy study of STYLAGE® Lin Chinese adults with Nasolabial Folds.

◌ CITATION ONLY
Full text is not openly licensed for redistribution here. Read it at the source:

Read at source →

Provenance

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov
Canonical: link ↗
Fetched: 2026-10-06 MST

Cite this

APA

Anonymous. (2021). A Controlled, Prospective, Randomized, Multi-Center, Subject and Evaluator-Blinded Study of the Safety and Effectiveness of STYLAGE® L Versus Restylane® for Correction of Moderate and Severe Nasolabial Folds in Chinese Adults. <em>Laboratoires Vivacy</em>. https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04861766

Vancouver

Anonymous. A Controlled, Prospective, Randomized, Multi-Center, Subject and Evaluator-Blinded Study of the Safety and Effectiveness of STYLAGE® L Versus Restylane® for Correction of Moderate and Severe Nasolabial Folds in Chinese Adults. Laboratoires Vivacy. 2021.

BibTeX

@misc{anon2021AContr, title = {A Controlled, Prospective, Randomized, Multi-Center, Subject and Evaluator-Blinded Study of the Safety and Effectiveness of STYLAGE® L Versus Restylane® for Correction of Moderate and Severe Nasolabial Folds in Chinese Adults}, author = {Anonymous}, journal = {Laboratoires Vivacy}, year = {2021}, }