Skip to content
Open access · CC-BY via OpenAlex

The Utility and Limitations of CRP, ESR and DAS28-CRP in Appraising Disease Activity in Rheumatoid Arthritis

Carl Orr, Aurélie Najm, Francis Young, Trudy McGarry, Monika Biniecka, Ursula Fearon, Douglas J. Veale

Frontiers in Medicine · 2018 · ▲ 167 citations

Abstract

Introduction Identifying and quantifying inflammatory disease activity in rheumatoid arthritis remains a challenge. Many studies have suggested that a large proportion of patients may have active inflammation, but normal inflammatory markers. Although various disease activity scores have been validated, most rely to large degree on biomarkers such as CRP and ESR. In this study, we examine the utility and limitations of these biomarkers, as well as the DAS28-CRP in appraising disease activity in RA. Methods 223 consecutive rheumatoid arthritis reporting knee arthralgia underwent synovial sampling of the affected knee via needle arthroscopy. The synovium was examined by microscopy with H+E staining as well as immunohistochemistry, and related to the ESR, CRP and DAS28-CRP on samples taken immediately before arthroscopy. Results Although a statistically significant positive correlation was observed between CRP and the level of inflammation in the biopsy retrieved (n=197, rho=0.43, CI 0.30 to 0.54, p<0.0001), there was histological evidence of inflammation in the synovium in 49.4% of the patients who had a normal CRP. A positive correlation was also observed between ESR and the level of inflammation in the biopsy retrieved (n=188, rho=0.29, CI 0.15 to 0.42 p<0.0001). A statistically significant but weak positive correlation was observed between the DAS28-CRP and synovial inflammation (n=189, rho=0.23, CI 0.09 to 0.37, p=0.0011). Only the CD19 infiltrate in the synovium correlated with serum CRP (n=70, rho=0.32, CI 0.08 to 0.52, p=0.0068). Conclusion CRP has a moderately strong relationship with disease activity, but there are significant pitfalls in the use of this biomarker in RA, and therefore a need interpret CRP results judiciously. The results of this study underline the heterogeneity of RA, and the need to develop improved panels of biomarkers, to better stratify RA, and to identify the cohort for whom inflammatory activity cannot be measured accurately with CRP.

◌ CITATION ONLY
Full text is not openly licensed for redistribution here. Read it at the source:

Read at source →

Provenance

Source
OpenAlex
DOI
10.3389/fmed.2018.00185
Canonical
link ↗
Fetched
2026-07-28 MST

Cite this

APA
Orr, C., Najm, A., Young, F., McGarry, T., Biniecka, M., Fearon, U., &amp; Veale, D.J. (2018). The Utility and Limitations of CRP, ESR and DAS28-CRP in Appraising Disease Activity in Rheumatoid Arthritis. <em>Frontiers in Medicine</em>. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2018.00185
Vancouver
Orr C, Najm A, Young F, McGarry T, Biniecka M, Fearon U, et al. The Utility and Limitations of CRP, ESR and DAS28-CRP in Appraising Disease Activity in Rheumatoid Arthritis. Frontiers in Medicine. 2018. doi:10.3389/fmed.2018.00185.
BibTeX
@article{carl2018TheUti, title = {The Utility and Limitations of CRP, ESR and DAS28-CRP in Appraising Disease Activity in Rheumatoid Arthritis}, author = {Carl Orr and Aurélie Najm and Francis Young and Trudy McGarry and Monika Biniecka and Ursula Fearon and Douglas J. Veale}, journal = {Frontiers in Medicine}, year = {2018}, doi = {10.3389/fmed.2018.00185}, }

Research neighborhood

References, citing works, and semantically nearest findings. Click a node to open it.

Related findings