Skip to content
Open access · US-GOV via ClinicalTrials.gov Clinical trial

The Efficacy and Safety of Regional Citrate Anticoagulation Versus No-anticoagulation for CRRT in Patients With Liver Failure and High Risk Bleeding: a Randomized, Control, Open-labeled Clinical Trial

Authors not listed

Air Force Military Medical University, China · 2018

Abstract

The purpose of this single center, randomized, control, open-labeled study is to evaluate the effect and safety of RCA versus no anticoagulation for CRRT in patients with liver failure and high risk bleeding.

◌ CITATION ONLY
Full text is not openly licensed for redistribution here. Read it at the source:

Read at source →

Provenance

Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Canonical
link ↗
Fetched
2026-10-18 MST

Cite this

APA
Anonymous. (2018). The Efficacy and Safety of Regional Citrate Anticoagulation Versus No-anticoagulation for CRRT in Patients With Liver Failure and High Risk Bleeding: a Randomized, Control, Open-labeled Clinical Trial. <em>Air Force Military Medical University, China</em>. https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03791190
Vancouver
Anonymous. The Efficacy and Safety of Regional Citrate Anticoagulation Versus No-anticoagulation for CRRT in Patients With Liver Failure and High Risk Bleeding: a Randomized, Control, Open-labeled Clinical Trial. Air Force Military Medical University, China. 2018.
BibTeX
@misc{anon2018TheEff, title = {The Efficacy and Safety of Regional Citrate Anticoagulation Versus No-anticoagulation for CRRT in Patients With Liver Failure and High Risk Bleeding: a Randomized, Control, Open-labeled Clinical Trial}, author = {Anonymous}, journal = {Air Force Military Medical University, China}, year = {2018}, }

Research neighborhood

References, citing works, and semantically nearest findings. Click a node to open it.

Related findings