Skip to content
Open access · CC-BY via OpenAlex

Sirtuins in Alzheimer’s Disease: SIRT2-Related GenoPhenotypes and Implications for PharmacoEpiGenetics

Ramón Cacabelos, Juan C. Carril, Natalia Cacabelos, Aleksey Kazantsev, Alex V. Vostrov, Lola Corzo, Pablo Cacabelos, Dmitry Goldgaber

International Journal of Molecular Sciences · 2019 · ▲ 84 citations

Abstract

Sirtuins (SIRT1-7) are NAD+-dependent protein deacetylases/ADP ribosyltransferases with important roles in chromatin silencing, cell cycle regulation, cellular differentiation, cellular stress response, metabolism and aging. Sirtuins are components of the epigenetic machinery, which is disturbed in Alzheimer’s disease (AD), contributing to AD pathogenesis. There is an association between the SIRT2-C/T genotype (rs10410544) (50.92%) and AD susceptibility in the APOEε4-negative population (SIRT2-C/C, 34.72%; SIRT2-T/T 14.36%). The integration of SIRT2 and APOE variants in bigenic clusters yields 18 haplotypes. The 5 most frequent bigenic genotypes in AD are 33CT (27.81%), 33CC (21.36%), 34CT (15.29%), 34CC (9.76%) and 33TT (7.18%). There is an accumulation of APOE-3/4 and APOE-4/4 carriers in SIRT2-T/T > SIRT2-C/T > SIRT2-C/C carriers, and also of SIRT2-T/T and SIRT2-C/T carriers in patients who harbor the APOE-4/4 genotype. SIRT2 variants influence biochemical, hematological, metabolic and cardiovascular phenotypes, and modestly affect the pharmacoepigenetic outcome in AD. SIRT2-C/T carriers are the best responders, SIRT2-T/T carriers show an intermediate pattern, and SIRT2-C/C carriers are the worst responders to a multifactorial treatment. In APOE-SIRT2 bigenic clusters, 33CC carriers respond better than 33TT and 34CT carriers, whereas 24CC and 44CC carriers behave as the worst responders. CYP2D6 extensive metabolizers (EM) are the best responders, poor metabolizers (PM) are the worst responders, and ultra-rapid metabolizers (UM) tend to be better responders that intermediate metabolizers (IM). In association with CYP2D6 genophenotypes, SIRT2-C/T-EMs are the best responders. Some Sirtuin modulators might be potential candidates for AD treatment.

◌ CITATION ONLY
Full text is not openly licensed for redistribution here. Read it at the source:

Read at source →

Provenance

Source
OpenAlex
DOI
10.3390/ijms20051249
Canonical
link ↗
Fetched
2026-06-22 MST

Cite this

APA
Cacabelos, R., Carril, J.C., Cacabelos, N., Kazantsev, A., Vostrov, A.V., Corzo, L., Cacabelos, P., &amp; Goldgaber, D. (2019). Sirtuins in Alzheimer’s Disease: SIRT2-Related GenoPhenotypes and Implications for PharmacoEpiGenetics. <em>International Journal of Molecular Sciences</em>. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms20051249
Vancouver
Cacabelos R, Carril JC, Cacabelos N, Kazantsev A, Vostrov AV, Corzo L, et al. Sirtuins in Alzheimer’s Disease: SIRT2-Related GenoPhenotypes and Implications for PharmacoEpiGenetics. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2019. doi:10.3390/ijms20051249.
BibTeX
@article{ramn2019Sirtui, title = {Sirtuins in Alzheimer’s Disease: SIRT2-Related GenoPhenotypes and Implications for PharmacoEpiGenetics}, author = {Ramón Cacabelos and Juan C. Carril and Natalia Cacabelos and Aleksey Kazantsev and Alex V. Vostrov and Lola Corzo and Pablo Cacabelos and Dmitry Goldgaber}, journal = {International Journal of Molecular Sciences}, year = {2019}, doi = {10.3390/ijms20051249}, }

Research neighborhood

References, citing works, and semantically nearest findings. Click a node to open it.

Related findings