Open access · CC-BY
via OpenAlex
Short‐term intermittent energy restriction interventions for weight management: a systematic review and meta‐analysis
Leanne Harris, Arlene M. McGarty, Lisa C. Hutchison, Louisa Ells, C. R. Hankey
Obesity Reviews · 2017 · ▲ 64 citations
Abstract
Summary This systematic review synthesized the available evidence on the effect of short‐term periods of intermittent energy restriction (weekly intermittent energy restriction; ≥7‐d energy restriction) in comparison with usual care (daily continuous energy restriction), in the treatment of overweight and obesity in adults. Six electronic databases were searched from inception to October 2016. Only randomized controlled trials of interventions (≥12 weeks) in adults with overweight and obesity were included. Five studies were included in this review. Weekly intermittent energy restriction periods ranged from an energy intake between 1757 and 6276 kJ/d −1 . The mean duration of the interventions was 26 (range 14 to 48) weeks. Meta‐analysis demonstrated no significant difference in weight loss between weekly intermittent energy restriction and continuous energy restriction post‐intervention (weighted mean difference: −1.36 [−3.23, 0.51], p = 0.15) and at follow‐up (weighted mean difference: −0.82 [−3.76, 2.11], p = 0.58). Both interventions achieved comparable weight loss of >5 kg and therefore were associated with clinical benefits to health. The findings support the use of weekly intermittent energy restriction as an alternative option for the treatment of obesity. Currently, there is insufficient evidence to support the long‐term sustainable effects of weekly intermittent energy restriction on weight management.
◌ CITATION ONLY
Full text is not openly licensed for redistribution here. Read it at the source:
Provenance
- Source
- OpenAlex
- DOI
- 10.1111/obr.12593
- Canonical
- link ↗
- Fetched
- 2026-06-16 MST
Cite this
APA
Harris, L., McGarty, A.M., Hutchison, L.C., Ells, L., & Hankey, C.R. (2017). Short‐term intermittent energy restriction interventions for weight management: a systematic review and meta‐analysis. <em>Obesity Reviews</em>. https://doi.org/10.1111/obr.12593
Vancouver
Harris L, McGarty AM, Hutchison LC, Ells L, Hankey CR. Short‐term intermittent energy restriction interventions for weight management: a systematic review and meta‐analysis. Obesity Reviews. 2017. doi:10.1111/obr.12593.
BibTeX
@article{leanne2017Shortt,
title = {Short‐term intermittent energy restriction interventions for weight management: a systematic review and meta‐analysis},
author = {Leanne Harris and Arlene M. McGarty and Lisa C. Hutchison and Louisa Ells and C. R. Hankey},
journal = {Obesity Reviews},
year = {2017},
doi = {10.1111/obr.12593},
}
Research neighborhood
References, citing works, and semantically nearest findings. Click a node to open it.
Related findings
Obesity 2020
Open access · OA
Intermittent Versus Continuous Energy Restriction for Weight Loss and Metabolic Improvement: A Meta‐Analysis and Systematic Review
Nutrition Metabolism and Cardiovascular Diseases 2018
Open access · OA
Effect of intermittent versus continuous energy restriction on weight loss, maintenance and cardiometabolic risk: A randomized 1-year trial
Clinical Nutrition 2019
Open access · OA
Intermittent energy restriction is comparable to continuous energy restriction for cardiometabolic health in adults with central obesity: A randomized controlled trial; the Met-IER study
Journal of Translational Medicine 2018
Open access · CC-BY
Intermittent versus continuous energy restriction on weight loss and cardiometabolic outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
JAMA Network Open 2018
Open access · CC-BY
Effect of Intermittent Compared With Continuous Energy Restricted Diet on Glycemic Control in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes
Journal of the American Heart Association 2023
Open access · CC-BY