Open access · CC-BY
via OpenAlex
ProtBAG: eleven organ‐specific proteome‐based biological age using CSF proteomics
Sarah Ko, Hui Cao, Mehrshad Saadatinia, Gao T. Wang, Elisa Konofagou, Donald E. Edmondson, Wenjia Bai, Arthur W. Toga, Christiane Reitz, Ye Ella Tian, Andrew Zalesky, Christos A. Davatzikos, Junhao Wen
Alzheimer s & Dementia · 2025
Abstract
Abstract Background Recent research 1,2 has generated increasing interest in modeling human aging and disease within a multi‐organ framework. Plasma proteomics 3 has emerged as a widely used approach for predicting individual chronological age, resulting in the proteome‐based biological age gap (ProtBAG). Here, we used CSF proteomics from the ADNI study to derive 11 organ‐specific ProtBAGs using 2 machine learning (ML) methods. Method CSF proteomics was generated using the SomaScan 7k platform in ADNI, which included 7,008 protein levels from 736 participants (mean age: 73.3 ± 7.4 years; 57% women). Missing proteomics values were imputed using AutoComplete 4 . Organ‐enriched proteins for 11 organ systems were determined by at least four‐fold higher mRNA levels in the tissue of interest than in other organ tissues. These organ‐enriched proteins were then fit to a linear support vector regression (SVR) and LASSO regression model. Nested random holdout cross‐validation (50 repetitions) was implemented; mean absolute error (MAE) and Pearson’s r were used to evaluate model performance. Result For proteomics imputation, we chose the imputed results with the copy‐mask amount of 0.3 (2% missing rate in data), which led to the best model performance ( r 2 =0.54). Overall, LASSO and Linear SVR achieved comparable MAE values with only slight differences between the two models. The brain and hepatic showed the lowest MAE values (Linear SVR: 4.56 and 4.52 for the brain and hepatic ProtBAGs; LASSO 4.55 and 4.52 for the brain and hepatic ProtBAGs) (Figure 1). Across the 11 organ systems, MAE values from our analyses, ranging from 4.5 to 6, were in line with previous literature using brain imaging 2 . In addition, the brain and hepatic showed the highest Pearson’s r values (Linear SVR: 0.62 and 0.64 for the brain and hepatic ProtBAGs; LASSO 0.63 and 0.65 for the brain and hepatic ProtBAGs) (Figure 2). Other organ systems, such as the endocrine, female reproductive system, and male reproductive system, showed relatively inferior model performance. Conclusion This study leverages CSF proteomics data from ADNI to accurately develop 11 organ‐specific ProtBAGs, enriching the organ aging clock framework established in previous literature using plasma proteomics. Future research will investigate the relationship between these ProtBAGs, cognition, and AD progression.
◌ CITATION ONLY
Full text is not openly licensed for redistribution here. Read it at the source:
Provenance
- Source
- OpenAlex
- DOI
- 10.1002/alz70862_110193
- Canonical
- link ↗
- Fetched
- 2026-10-14 MST
Cite this
APA
Ko, S., Cao, H., Saadatinia, M., Wang, G.T., Konofagou, E., Edmondson, D.E., Bai, W., Toga, A.W., Reitz, C., Tian, Y.E., Zalesky, A., Davatzikos, C.A., & Wen, J. (2025). ProtBAG: eleven organ‐specific proteome‐based biological age using CSF proteomics. <em>Alzheimer s & Dementia</em>. https://doi.org/10.1002/alz70862_110193
Vancouver
Ko S, Cao H, Saadatinia M, Wang GT, Konofagou E, Edmondson DE, et al. ProtBAG: eleven organ‐specific proteome‐based biological age using CSF proteomics. Alzheimer s & Dementia. 2025. doi:10.1002/alz70862_110193.
BibTeX
@article{sarah2025ProtBA,
title = {ProtBAG: eleven organ‐specific proteome‐based biological age using CSF proteomics},
author = {Sarah Ko and Hui Cao and Mehrshad Saadatinia and Gao T. Wang and Elisa Konofagou and Donald E. Edmondson and Wenjia Bai and Arthur W. Toga and Christiane Reitz and Ye Ella Tian and Andrew Zalesky and Christos A. Davatzikos and Junhao Wen},
journal = {Alzheimer s & Dementia},
year = {2025},
doi = {10.1002/alz70862_110193},
}
Research neighborhood
References, citing works, and semantically nearest findings. Click a node to open it.
Related findings
Alzheimer s & Dementia 2025
Open access · CC-BY
ProtBAG: Eleven organ‐specific proteome‐based biological age using CSF proteomics
Frontiers in cellular neuroscience
Open access · OA
Cellular senescence in brain aging and neurodegeneration: from molecular mechanisms to translational opportunities
Alzheimer s & Dementia 2023
Open access · OA
Proteomic‐based Biological Aging Clock and MRI Markers of Cerebrovascular Disease: Atherosclerosis Risk in Community Study
Alzheimer s & Dementia 2024
Open access · CC-BY
Genetic analyses of the plasma proteome and metabolome from the same cohort pinpoint AD risk associated molecular phenotypes
Alzheimer s & Dementia 2022
Preprint · CC0
Biological Brain Age Prediction Using Machine Learning on Structural Neuroimaging Data: Multi‐Cohort Validation Against Biomarkers of Alzheimer’s Disease and Neurodegeneration
Communications Medicine 2025
Open access · CC-BY