Skip to content
Open access · OA via OpenAlex

Prediction of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus With Alternative Definitions of the Metabolic Syndrome

Anthony J. Hanley, Andrew John Karter, Ken Williams, Andreas Festa, Ralph B. D' Agostino, Lynne E. Wagenknecht, Steven M. Haffner

Circulation · 2005 · ▲ 266 citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In addition to predicting cardiovascular disease (CVD) morbidity and mortality, the metabolic syndrome is strongly associated with the development of type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM), itself an important risk factor for CVD. Our objective was to compare the ability of various metabolic syndrome criteria (including those recently proposed by the International Diabetes Federation), markers of insulin resistance (IR) and inflammation, and impaired glucose tolerance (IGT) in the prediction of DM and to determine whether various proposed modifications to the National Cholesterol Education program (NCEP) metabolic syndrome definition improved predictive ability. METHODS AND RESULTS: We examined 822 subjects in the Insulin Resistance Atherosclerosis Study aged 40 to 69 years who were nondiabetic at baseline. After 5.2 years, 148 individuals had developed DM. IGT, metabolic syndrome definitions, and IR markers all significantly predicted DM, with odds ratios ranging from 3.4 to 5.4 (all P<0.001), although there were no significant differences in the areas under the receiver operator characteristic (AROC) curves between the definitions. Modifying or requiring obesity, glucose, or IR components in NCEP-defined metabolic syndrome did not significantly alter the predictive ability of the definition under AROC curve criteria (all P>0.05). Similarly, although IR and inflammation variables were significantly associated with incident DM when included in multivariate models with NCEP-defined metabolic syndrome (all P<0.01), expanding the definition by adding these variables as components did not significantly alter the predictive ability of the definition under AROC curve criteria (all P>0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The International Diabetes Federation and NCEP metabolic syndrome definitions predicted DM at least as well as the World Health Organization definition, despite not requiring the use of oral glucose tolerance testing or measures of IR or microalbuminuria. Modifications or additions to the NCEP metabolic syndrome definition had limited impact on the prediction of DM.

◌ CITATION ONLY
Full text is not openly licensed for redistribution here. Read it at the source:

Read at source →

Provenance

Source
OpenAlex
DOI
10.1161/circulationaha.105.559633
Canonical
link ↗
Fetched
2026-10-20 MST

Cite this

APA
Hanley, A.J., Karter, A.J., Williams, K., Festa, A., Agostino, R.B.D., Wagenknecht, L.E., &amp; Haffner, S.M. (2005). Prediction of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus With Alternative Definitions of the Metabolic Syndrome. <em>Circulation</em>. https://doi.org/10.1161/circulationaha.105.559633
Vancouver
Hanley AJ, Karter AJ, Williams K, Festa A, Agostino RBD, Wagenknecht LE, et al. Prediction of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus With Alternative Definitions of the Metabolic Syndrome. Circulation. 2005. doi:10.1161/circulationaha.105.559633.
BibTeX
@article{anthony2005Predic, title = {Prediction of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus With Alternative Definitions of the Metabolic Syndrome}, author = {Anthony J. Hanley and Andrew John Karter and Ken Williams and Andreas Festa and Ralph B. D' Agostino and Lynne E. Wagenknecht and Steven M. Haffner}, journal = {Circulation}, year = {2005}, doi = {10.1161/circulationaha.105.559633}, }

Research neighborhood

References, citing works, and semantically nearest findings. Click a node to open it.

Related findings