Open access · OA
via OpenAlex
Potential Mechanisms for Cancer Resistance in Elephants and Comparative Cellular Response to DNA Damage in Humans
Lisa M. Abegglen, Aleah F. Caulin, Ashley Chan, Kristy Lee, Rosann Robinson, Michael S. Campbell, Wendy K. Kiso, Dennis Schmitt, Peter J. Waddell, Srividya Bhaskara, Shane T. Jensen, Carlo C. Maley, Joshua D. Schiffman
JAMA · 2015 · ▲ 502 citations
Abstract
IMPORTANCE: Evolutionary medicine may provide insights into human physiology and pathophysiology, including tumor biology. OBJECTIVE: To identify mechanisms for cancer resistance in elephants and compare cellular response to DNA damage among elephants, healthy human controls, and cancer-prone patients with Li-Fraumeni syndrome (LFS). DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: A comprehensive survey of necropsy data was performed across 36 mammalian species to validate cancer resistance in large and long-lived organisms, including elephants (n = 644). The African and Asian elephant genomes were analyzed for potential mechanisms of cancer resistance. Peripheral blood lymphocytes from elephants, healthy human controls, and patients with LFS were tested in vitro in the laboratory for DNA damage response. The study included African and Asian elephants (n = 8), patients with LFS (n = 10), and age-matched human controls (n = 11). Human samples were collected at the University of Utah between June 2014 and July 2015. EXPOSURES: Ionizing radiation and doxorubicin. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Cancer mortality across species was calculated and compared by body size and life span. The elephant genome was investigated for alterations in cancer-related genes. DNA repair and apoptosis were compared in elephant vs human peripheral blood lymphocytes. RESULTS: Across mammals, cancer mortality did not increase with body size and/or maximum life span (eg, for rock hyrax, 1% [95% CI, 0%-5%]; African wild dog, 8% [95% CI, 0%-16%]; lion, 2% [95% CI, 0%-7%]). Despite their large body size and long life span, elephants remain cancer resistant, with an estimated cancer mortality of 4.81% (95% CI, 3.14%-6.49%), compared with humans, who have 11% to 25% cancer mortality. While humans have 1 copy (2 alleles) of TP53, African elephants have at least 20 copies (40 alleles), including 19 retrogenes (38 alleles) with evidence of transcriptional activity measured by reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction. In response to DNA damage, elephant lymphocytes underwent p53-mediated apoptosis at higher rates than human lymphocytes proportional to TP53 status (ionizing radiation exposure: patients with LFS, 2.71% [95% CI, 1.93%-3.48%] vs human controls, 7.17% [95% CI, 5.91%-8.44%] vs elephants, 14.64% [95% CI, 10.91%-18.37%]; P < .001; doxorubicin exposure: human controls, 8.10% [95% CI, 6.55%-9.66%] vs elephants, 24.77% [95% CI, 23.0%-26.53%]; P < .001). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Compared with other mammalian species, elephants appeared to have a lower-than-expected rate of cancer, potentially related to multiple copies of TP53. Compared with human cells, elephant cells demonstrated increased apoptotic response following DNA damage. These findings, if replicated, could represent an evolutionary-based approach for understanding mechanisms related to cancer suppression.
◌ CITATION ONLY
Full text is not openly licensed for redistribution here. Read it at the source:
Provenance
- Source
- OpenAlex
- DOI
- 10.1001/jama.2015.13134
- Canonical
- link ↗
- Fetched
- 2026-06-09 MST
Cite this
APA
Abegglen, L.M., Caulin, A.F., Chan, A., Lee, K., Robinson, R., Campbell, M.S., Kiso, W.K., Schmitt, D., Waddell, P.J., Bhaskara, S., Jensen, S.T., Maley, C.C., & Schiffman, J.D. (2015). Potential Mechanisms for Cancer Resistance in Elephants and Comparative Cellular Response to DNA Damage in Humans. <em>JAMA</em>. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2015.13134
Vancouver
Abegglen LM, Caulin AF, Chan A, Lee K, Robinson R, Campbell MS, et al. Potential Mechanisms for Cancer Resistance in Elephants and Comparative Cellular Response to DNA Damage in Humans. JAMA. 2015. doi:10.1001/jama.2015.13134.
BibTeX
@article{lisa2015Potent,
title = {Potential Mechanisms for Cancer Resistance in Elephants and Comparative Cellular Response to DNA Damage in Humans},
author = {Lisa M. Abegglen and Aleah F. Caulin and Ashley Chan and Kristy Lee and Rosann Robinson and Michael S. Campbell and Wendy K. Kiso and Dennis Schmitt and Peter J. Waddell and Srividya Bhaskara and Shane T. Jensen and Carlo C. Maley and Joshua D. Schiffman},
journal = {JAMA},
year = {2015},
doi = {10.1001/jama.2015.13134},
}
Research neighborhood
References, citing works, and semantically nearest findings. Click a node to open it.
Related findings
Journal of Biomedicine and Biotechnology 2012
Open access · CC-BY
New Insights into p53 Signaling and Cancer Cell Response to DNA Damage: Implications for Cancer Therapy
Nature 2003
Citation only
A DNA damage checkpoint response in telomere-initiated senescence
International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2019
Open access · CC-BY
Nickel Carcinogenesis Mechanism: DNA Damage
Cardiovascular Research 2006
Open access · OA
DNA damage and repair in atherosclerosis
International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2013
Open access · CC-BY
Mitochondrial and Nuclear DNA Damage and Repair in Age-Related Macular Degeneration
Aging 2010
Open access · CC-BY