Open access · CC-BY
via OpenAlex
Optimizing methods and dodging pitfalls in microbiome research
Dorothy Kim, Casey E. Hofstaedter, Chunyu Zhao, Lisa M. Mattei, Ceylan Tanes, Erik Clarke, Abigail Lauder, Scott Sherrill-Mix, Christel Chehoud, Judith R. Kelsen, Máire Conrad, Ronald G. Collman, Robert N. Baldassano, Frederic D. Bushman, Kyle Bittinger
Microbiome · 2017 · ▲ 564 citations
Abstract
Research on the human microbiome has yielded numerous insights into health and disease, but also has resulted in a wealth of experimental artifacts. Here, we present suggestions for optimizing experimental design and avoiding known pitfalls, organized in the typical order in which studies are carried out. We first review best practices in experimental design and introduce common confounders such as age, diet, antibiotic use, pet ownership, longitudinal instability, and microbial sharing during cohousing in animal studies. Typically, samples will need to be stored, so we provide data on best practices for several sample types. We then discuss design and analysis of positive and negative controls, which should always be run with experimental samples. We introduce a convenient set of non-biological DNA sequences that can be useful as positive controls for high-volume analysis. Careful analysis of negative and positive controls is particularly important in studies of samples with low microbial biomass, where contamination can comprise most or all of a sample. Lastly, we summarize approaches to enhancing experimental robustness by careful control of multiple comparisons and to comparing discovery and validation cohorts. We hope the experimental tactics summarized here will help researchers in this exciting field advance their studies efficiently while avoiding errors.
◌ CITATION ONLY
Full text is not openly licensed for redistribution here. Read it at the source:
Provenance
- Source
- OpenAlex
- DOI
- 10.1186/s40168-017-0267-5
- Canonical
- link ↗
- Fetched
- 2026-06-13 MST
Cite this
APA
Kim, D., Hofstaedter, C.E., Zhao, C., Mattei, L.M., Tanes, C., Clarke, E., Lauder, A., Sherrill-Mix, S., Chehoud, C., Kelsen, J.R., Conrad, M., Collman, R.G., Baldassano, R.N., Bushman, F.D., & Bittinger, K. (2017). Optimizing methods and dodging pitfalls in microbiome research. <em>Microbiome</em>. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40168-017-0267-5
Vancouver
Kim D, Hofstaedter CE, Zhao C, Mattei LM, Tanes C, Clarke E, et al. Optimizing methods and dodging pitfalls in microbiome research. Microbiome. 2017. doi:10.1186/s40168-017-0267-5.
BibTeX
@article{dorothy2017Optimi,
title = {Optimizing methods and dodging pitfalls in microbiome research},
author = {Dorothy Kim and Casey E. Hofstaedter and Chunyu Zhao and Lisa M. Mattei and Ceylan Tanes and Erik Clarke and Abigail Lauder and Scott Sherrill-Mix and Christel Chehoud and Judith R. Kelsen and Máire Conrad and Ronald G. Collman and Robert N. Baldassano and Frederic D. Bushman and Kyle Bittinger},
journal = {Microbiome},
year = {2017},
doi = {10.1186/s40168-017-0267-5},
}
Research neighborhood
References, citing works, and semantically nearest findings. Click a node to open it.
Related findings
Nature Communications 2020
Open access · CC-BY
A predictive index for health status using species-level gut microbiome profiling
Bone Research 2018
Open access · CC-BY
mTOR signaling in skeletal development and disease
Neonatology 2017
Citation only
The “Golden Age” of Probiotics: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized and Observational Studies in Preterm Infants
Biochemical Journal 2024
Open access · CC-BY
The mTORC2 signaling network: targets and cross-talks
JOR Spine 2020
Open access · CC-BY
Autophagy and mTOR signaling during intervertebral disc aging and degeneration
Advances in Therapy 2020
Open access · CC-BY