Preprint · CC-BY
via bioRxiv
Neural populations in the language network differ in the size of their temporal receptive windows
Regev, T. I., Casto, C., Hosseini, E. A., Adamek, M., Ritaccio, A. L., Willie, J. T., Brunner, P., Fedorenko, E.
biorxiv · 2024
Abstract
Despite long knowing what brain areas support language comprehension, our knowledge of the neural computations that these frontal and temporal regions implement remains limited. One important unresolved question concerns functional differences among the neural populations that comprise the language network. Leveraging the high spatiotemporal resolution of intracranial recordings, we examined responses to sentences and linguistically degraded conditions and discovered three response profiles that differ in their temporal dynamics. These profiles appear to reflect different temporal receptive windows (TRWs), with average TRWs of about 1, 4, and 6 words, as estimated with a simple one-parameter model. Neural populations exhibiting these profiles are interleaved across the language network, which suggests that all language regions have direct access to distinct, multi-scale representations of linguistic input--a property that may be critical for the efficiency and robustness of language processing.
◌ CITATION ONLY
Full text is not openly licensed for redistribution here. Read it at the source:
Provenance
- Source
- bioRxiv
- DOI
- 10.1101/2022.12.30.522216
- Canonical
- link ↗
- Fetched
- 2026-05-31 MST
Cite this
APA
I., R.T., C., C., A., H.E., M., A., L., R.A., T., W.J., P., B., & E., F. (2024). Neural populations in the language network differ in the size of their temporal receptive windows. <em>biorxiv</em>. https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.12.30.522216
Vancouver
I. RT, C. C, A. HE, M. A, L. RA, T. WJ, et al. Neural populations in the language network differ in the size of their temporal receptive windows. biorxiv. 2024. doi:10.1101/2022.12.30.522216.
BibTeX
@unpublished{regev2024Neural,
title = {Neural populations in the language network differ in the size of their temporal receptive windows},
author = {Regev, T. I. and Casto, C. and Hosseini, E. A. and Adamek, M. and Ritaccio, A. L. and Willie, J. T. and Brunner, P. and Fedorenko, E.},
journal = {biorxiv},
year = {2024},
doi = {10.1101/2022.12.30.522216},
}
Research neighborhood
References, citing works, and semantically nearest findings. Click a node to open it.
Related findings
PloS one 2026
Open access · OA
Differential effects of paraquat-induced oxidative stress on functional aging and lifespan in male and female Drosophila melanogaster.
Cell Research 2018
Open access · CC-BY
UPRmt regulation and output: a stress response mediated by mitochondrial-nuclear communication
Molecules and cells 2026
Open access · OA
Multilayered regulation of longevity in Caenorhabditis elegans.
biorxiv 2024
Preprint · CC-BY
Developmental trajectories and differences in functional brain network properties of preterm and at-term neonates
biorxiv 2024
Preprint · CC-BY
Individual variability in neural representations of mind-wandering
Trends in Cell Biology 2019
Citation only