Open access · US-GOV
via ClinicalTrials.gov Clinical trial
Myeloma XIV: A Phase III Trial to Compare Standard and Frailty-adjusted Induction Therapy With Ixazomib, Lenalidomide and Dexamethasone (IRD) and Maintenance Lenalidomide (R) to Lenalidomide Plus Ixazomib (R+I)
Authors not listed
University of Leeds · 2020
Abstract
Trial Title:
FiTNEss (UK-MRA Myeloma XIV) - Frailty-adjusted therapy in Transplant Non-Eligible patients with newly diagnosed Multiple Myeloma
Overview:
A phase III, multi-centre, randomised controlled trial to compare standard (reactive) and frailty-adjusted (adaptive) induction therapy delivery with the novel triplet ixazomib, lenalidomide and dexamethasone (IRD), and to compare maintenance lenalidomide (R) to lenalidomide plus ixazomib (R+I) in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma not suitable for a stem cell transplant.
All participants receive induction treatment with ixazomib, lenalidomide and dexamethasone and are randomised on a 1:1 basis at trial entry to the use of frailty score-adjusted up-front dose reductions vs. standard up-front dosing followed by toxicity dependent reactive dose-modifications during therapy. Following 12 cycles of induction treatment participants alive and progression-free undergo a second randomisation on a 1:1 basis to maintenance treatment with lenalidomide plus placebo versus lenalidomide plus ixazomib. Participants and their treating physicians will be blinded to maintenance allocation.
Participant population:
* Newly diagnosed as having Multiple Myeloma (MM) according to the updated IMWG diagnostic criteria 2014 (see Appendix 1 for criteria)
* Not eligible for stem cell transplant
* Aged at least 18 years
* Able to provide written informed consent
Number of participants:
740 participants will be entered into the trial at Randomisation 1 (R1), with 478 participants at Randomisation 2 (R2).
Objectives:
The primary objectives of this study are to determine:
* Early treatment cessation (within 60 days of randomisation) for standard versus frailty-adjusted up-front dosing
* Progression-free survival (PFS, from maintenance randomisation) for lenalidomide + placebo (R) versus lenalidomide + ixazomib (R+I)
The secondary objectives of this study are to assess progression-free survival (PFS) for standard versus frailty-adjusted up-front dosing reductions, time to progression, time to 2nd PFS event (PFS2), overall survival (OS), survival after progression, deaths within 12 months of R1, overall response rate (ORR), attainment of ≥VGPR, attainment of MRD negativity, duration of response, time to improved response, time to next treatment, treatment compliance and total amount of therapy delivered, toxicity \& safety including the incidence of SPMs, Quality of Life (QoL), cost effectiveness of standard versus frailty-adjusted up-front dosing of IRD and cost-effectiveness of R + I versus R.
Exploratory objectives are prospective validation of a novel frailty risk score (UK-MRA Myeloma Risk Profile - MRP), usefulness of Karnofsky Performance Status (PS), and association of molecular subgroups with response, PFS and OS.
◌ CITATION ONLY
Full text is not openly licensed for redistribution here. Read it at the source:
Provenance
- Source
- ClinicalTrials.gov
- Canonical
- link ↗
- Fetched
- 2026-10-20 MST
Cite this
APA
Anonymous. (2020). Myeloma XIV: A Phase III Trial to Compare Standard and Frailty-adjusted Induction Therapy With Ixazomib, Lenalidomide and Dexamethasone (IRD) and Maintenance Lenalidomide (R) to Lenalidomide Plus Ixazomib (R+I). <em>University of Leeds</em>. https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03720041
Vancouver
Anonymous. Myeloma XIV: A Phase III Trial to Compare Standard and Frailty-adjusted Induction Therapy With Ixazomib, Lenalidomide and Dexamethasone (IRD) and Maintenance Lenalidomide (R) to Lenalidomide Plus Ixazomib (R+I). University of Leeds. 2020.
BibTeX
@misc{anon2020Myelom,
title = {Myeloma XIV: A Phase III Trial to Compare Standard and Frailty-adjusted Induction Therapy With Ixazomib, Lenalidomide and Dexamethasone (IRD) and Maintenance Lenalidomide (R) to Lenalidomide Plus Ixazomib (R+I)},
author = {Anonymous},
journal = {University of Leeds},
year = {2020},
}
Research neighborhood
References, citing works, and semantically nearest findings. Click a node to open it.
Related findings
Fondazione EMN Italy Onlus 2014
Open access · US-GOV
A PHASE III, MULTICENTRE, RANDOMIZED, CONTROLLED STUDY TO DETERMINE THE EFFICACY AND SAFETY OF STANDARD SCHEDULE VERSUS A NEW ALGORITHM OF DOSE REDUCTIONS IN ELDERLY AND UNFIT NEWLY DIAGNOSED MULTIPLE MYELOMA PATIENTS RECEIVING LENALIDOMIDE PLUS STEROIDS
The Lymphoma Academic Research Organisation 2009
Open access · US-GOV
Double Blind Randomized Phase III Study of Lenalidomide Maintenance Versus Placebo in Responding Elderly Patients With DLBCL and Treated With R-CHOP in First Line
Cigdem Sahinbas YILMAZ 2006
Open access · US-GOV
Phase III Trial Comparing Treatment With Melphalan+Prednisolon (MP) With Melphalan+Prednisolon+Thalidomide (MPT) for Previously Untreated Elderly Patients With Multiple Myeloma
Hull University Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust 2016
Open access · US-GOV
Assessment of Frailty in Elderly People With Ischemic Heart Disease Being Considered for Revascularisation.
Pacira Pharmaceuticals, Inc 2011
Open access · US-GOV
Cryo-Touch III Refinement Study Investigational Plan
Glostrup University Hospital, Copenhagen 2026
Open access · US-GOV