Skip to content
Open access · US-GOV via ClinicalTrials.gov Clinical trial

Monocentric, Randomized, Subject and Rater Blinded Clinical Investigation to Prove the Non-inferiority of Belotero® Basic Versus Juvéderm® Ultra 3 Containing Lidocaine - After Single Injection for Correction of Nasolabial Folds (NLF)

Authors not listed

Merz Pharmaceuticals GmbH · 2011

Abstract

This study will investigate the non-inferiority of Belotero® Basic versus Juvéderm® Ultra 3 in the treatment of nasolabial folds

◌ CITATION ONLY
Full text is not openly licensed for redistribution here. Read it at the source:

Read at source →

Provenance

Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Canonical
link ↗
Fetched
2026-10-22 MST

Cite this

APA
Anonymous. (2011). Monocentric, Randomized, Subject and Rater Blinded Clinical Investigation to Prove the Non-inferiority of Belotero® Basic Versus Juvéderm® Ultra 3 Containing Lidocaine - After Single Injection for Correction of Nasolabial Folds (NLF). <em>Merz Pharmaceuticals GmbH</em>. https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT01305187
Vancouver
Anonymous. Monocentric, Randomized, Subject and Rater Blinded Clinical Investigation to Prove the Non-inferiority of Belotero® Basic Versus Juvéderm® Ultra 3 Containing Lidocaine - After Single Injection for Correction of Nasolabial Folds (NLF). Merz Pharmaceuticals GmbH. 2011.
BibTeX
@misc{anon2011Monoce, title = {Monocentric, Randomized, Subject and Rater Blinded Clinical Investigation to Prove the Non-inferiority of Belotero® Basic Versus Juvéderm® Ultra 3 Containing Lidocaine - After Single Injection for Correction of Nasolabial Folds (NLF)}, author = {Anonymous}, journal = {Merz Pharmaceuticals GmbH}, year = {2011}, }

Research neighborhood

References, citing works, and semantically nearest findings. Click a node to open it.

Related findings