Skip to content
Citation only via OpenAlex

Inflammatory Biomarker Levels After Propofol or Sevoflurane Anesthesia: A Meta-analysis

Liam J. O’Bryan, Kelly J. Atkins, Adam C. Lipszyc, David A. Scott, BRENDAN S. SILBERT, Lisbeth Anne Evered

Anesthesia & Analgesia · 2021 · ▲ 53 citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The perioperative inflammatory response may be implicated in adverse outcomes including neurocognitive dysfunction and cancer recurrence after oncological surgery. The immunomodulatory role of anesthetic agents has been demonstrated in vitro; however, its clinical relevance is unclear. The purpose of this meta-analysis was to compare propofol and sevoflurane with respect to biomarkers of perioperative inflammation. The secondary aim was to correlate markers of inflammation with clinical measures of perioperative cognition. METHODS: Databases were searched for randomized controlled trials examining perioperative inflammation after general anesthesia using propofol compared to sevoflurane. Inflammatory biomarkers investigated were interleukin (IL)-6, IL-10, tissue necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α), and C-reactive protein (CRP). The secondary outcome was incidence of perioperative neurocognitive disorders. Meta-analysis with metaregression was performed to determine the difference between propofol and sevoflurane. RESULTS: Twenty-three studies were included with 1611 participants. Studies varied by surgery type, duration, and participant age. There was an increase in the mean inflammatory biomarker levels following surgery, with meta-analysis revealing no difference in effect between propofol and sevoflurane. Heterogeneity between studies was high, with surgery type, duration, and patient age contributing to the variance across studies. Only 5 studies examined postoperative cognitive outcomes; thus, a meta-analysis could not be performed. Nonetheless, of these 5 studies, 4 reported a reduced incidence of cognitive decline associated with propofol use. CONCLUSIONS: Surgery induces an inflammatory response; however, the inflammatory response did not differ as a function of anesthetic technique. This absence of an effect suggests that patient and surgical variables may have a far more significant impact on the postoperative inflammatory responses than anesthetic technique. The majority of studies assessing perioperative cognition in older patients reported a benefit associated with the use of propofol; however, larger trials using homogenous outcomes are needed to demonstrate such an effect.

◌ CITATION ONLY
Full text is not openly licensed for redistribution here. Read it at the source:

Read at source →

Provenance

Source
OpenAlex
DOI
10.1213/ane.0000000000005671
Canonical
link ↗
Fetched
2026-10-15 MST

Cite this

APA
O’Bryan, L.J., Atkins, K.J., Lipszyc, A.C., Scott, D.A., SILBERT, B., &amp; Evered, L.A. (2021). Inflammatory Biomarker Levels After Propofol or Sevoflurane Anesthesia: A Meta-analysis. <em>Anesthesia & Analgesia</em>. https://doi.org/10.1213/ane.0000000000005671
Vancouver
O’Bryan LJ, Atkins KJ, Lipszyc AC, Scott DA, SILBERT B, Evered LA. Inflammatory Biomarker Levels After Propofol or Sevoflurane Anesthesia: A Meta-analysis. Anesthesia & Analgesia. 2021. doi:10.1213/ane.0000000000005671.
BibTeX
@article{liam2021Inflam, title = {Inflammatory Biomarker Levels After Propofol or Sevoflurane Anesthesia: A Meta-analysis}, author = {Liam J. O’Bryan and Kelly J. Atkins and Adam C. Lipszyc and David A. Scott and BRENDAN S. SILBERT and Lisbeth Anne Evered}, journal = {Anesthesia & Analgesia}, year = {2021}, doi = {10.1213/ane.0000000000005671}, }

Research neighborhood

References, citing works, and semantically nearest findings. Click a node to open it.

Related findings