Open access · OA
via Europe PMC
DNA Methylation Signatures of Cellular Senescence Are Not Reversed by Senolytic Treatment.
Kasamoto J, González J, Markov Y, Sehgal R, Lee E, Dwaraka VB, Smith R, Higgins-Chen AT.
Aging cell · 2026
Abstract
Epigenetic clocks are commonly used aging biomarkers based on DNA methylation that predict long-term morbidity and mortality risk. Increased cellular senescence(definition) with age is also posited to contribute to age-related disease and mortality. However, prior studies have found that existing epigenetic clocks show inconsistent associations with cellular senescence and no reductions after senolytic treatment. We hypothesize this reflects that senescence-related CpGs are a small proportion of age-related CpGs, and that an epigenetic clock(definition) focused on a core senescence signal conserved across different cell types and different senescence inducers would be a better tool for monitoring senescence and senolytic treatment compared to traditional epigenetic clocks. In our study, we find that senescence, age and mortality risk intersect at a small subset of the DNA methylome (9363 CpGs out of 396,333 analyzed; 2.4%). Utilizing these CpGs, we generated three different epigenetic clocks trained to predict in vitro senescence, age, and mortality, respectively. Surprisingly, all three of these predictors stayed the same or even accelerated after senolytic treatment in both in vivo and in vitro data. Our findings not only call into question whether cellular senescence can be captured by DNA methylation but also challenge the assumption that aging biomarkers decrease after geroscience interventions.
◌ CITATION ONLY
Full text is not openly licensed for redistribution here. Read it at the source:
Provenance
- Source
- Europe PMC
- DOI
- 10.1111/acel.70430
- Canonical
- link ↗
- Fetched
- 2026-07-01 MST
Cite this
APA
J, K., J, G., Y, M., R, S., E, L., VB, D., R, S., & AT., H. (2026). DNA Methylation Signatures of Cellular Senescence Are Not Reversed by Senolytic Treatment. <em>Aging cell</em>. https://doi.org/10.1111/acel.70430
Vancouver
J K, J G, Y M, R S, E L, VB D, et al. DNA Methylation Signatures of Cellular Senescence Are Not Reversed by Senolytic Treatment. Aging cell. 2026. doi:10.1111/acel.70430.
BibTeX
@article{kasamoto2026DNAMet,
title = {DNA Methylation Signatures of Cellular Senescence Are Not Reversed by Senolytic Treatment.},
author = {Kasamoto J and González J and Markov Y and Sehgal R and Lee E and Dwaraka VB and Smith R and Higgins-Chen AT.},
journal = {Aging cell},
year = {2026},
doi = {10.1111/acel.70430},
}
Research neighborhood
References, citing works, and semantically nearest findings. Click a node to open it.
Related findings
npj Aging 2025
Open access · CC-BY
Epigenetic age predictors for non-invasive assessment of human skin
Frontiers in Bioinformatics 2022
Open access · CC-BY
DNA Methylation, Aging, and Cancer Risk: A Mini-Review
Aging Cell 2024
Open access · CC-BY
Alterations of the gut microbiome are associated with epigenetic age acceleration and physical fitness
Frontiers in Genetics 2020
Open access · CC-BY
DNA Methylation Biomarkers in Aging and Age-Related Diseases
Chinese Medical Journal 2021
Open access · CC-BY
Epigenetic clocks in the pediatric population: when and why they tick?
Aging and disease 2026
Citation only