Skip to content
Open access · CC-BY via OpenAlex

Differential Roles of Environmental Enrichment in Alzheimer’s Type of Neurodegeneration and Physiological Aging

Vladimir V. Salmin, Yulia K. Komleva, Natalia V. Kuvacheva, Andrey V. Morgun, Е. Д. Хилажева, Olga L. Lopatina, Е. А. Пожиленкова, Konstantin A. Shapovalov, Yu. A. Uspenskaya, Alla B. Salmina

Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience · 2017 · ▲ 36 citations

Abstract

Impairment of hippocampal adult neurogenesis in aging or degenerating brain is a well-known phenomenon caused by the shortage of brain stem cell pool, alterations in the local microenvironment within the neurogenic niches, or deregulation of stem cell development. Environmental enrichment (EE) has been proposed as a potent tool to restore brain functions, to prevent aging-associated neurodegeneration, and to cure neuronal deficits seen in neurodevelopmental and neurodegenerative disorders. Here we report our data on the effects of environmental enrichment on hippocampal neurogenesis in vivo and neurosphere-forming capacity of hippocampal stem/progenitor cells in vitro. Two models - Alzheimer’s type of neurodegeneration and physiological brain aging – were chosen for the comparative analysis of EE effects. We found that environmental enrichment greatly affects the expression of markers specific for stem cells, progenitor cells and differentiated neurons (Pax6, Ngn2, NeuroD1, NeuN) in the hippocampus of young adult rats or rats with Alzheimer’s disease model but less efficiently in aged animals. Application of time-lag mathematical model for the analysis of impedance traces obtained in real-time monitoring of cell proliferation in vitro revealed that EE could restore neurosphere-forming capacity of hippocampal stem/progenitor cells more efficiently in young adult animals (4-fold greater in the control group comparing to the Alzheimer’s disease model group) but not in the aged rats (no positive effect of environmental enrichment at all). In accordance with the results obtained in vivo, EE was almost ineffective in the recovery of hippocampal neurogenic reserve in vitro in aged, but not in amyloid-treated or young adult, rats. Therefore, EE-based neuroprotective strategies effective in Aβ-affected brain could not be directly extrapolated to aged brain.

◌ CITATION ONLY
Full text is not openly licensed for redistribution here. Read it at the source:

Read at source →

Provenance

Source
OpenAlex
DOI
10.3389/fnagi.2017.00245
Canonical
link ↗
Fetched
2026-10-27 MST

Cite this

APA
Salmin, V.V., Komleva, Y.K., Kuvacheva, N.V., Morgun, A.V., Хилажева, �.�., Lopatina, O.L., Пожиленкова, �.�., Shapovalov, K.A., Uspenskaya, Y.A., &amp; Salmina, A.B. (2017). Differential Roles of Environmental Enrichment in Alzheimer’s Type of Neurodegeneration and Physiological Aging. <em>Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience</em>. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnagi.2017.00245
Vancouver
Salmin VV, Komleva YK, Kuvacheva NV, Morgun AV, Хилажева ��, Lopatina OL, et al. Differential Roles of Environmental Enrichment in Alzheimer’s Type of Neurodegeneration and Physiological Aging. Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience. 2017. doi:10.3389/fnagi.2017.00245.
BibTeX
@article{vladimir2017Differ, title = {Differential Roles of Environmental Enrichment in Alzheimer’s Type of Neurodegeneration and Physiological Aging}, author = {Vladimir V. Salmin and Yulia K. Komleva and Natalia V. Kuvacheva and Andrey V. Morgun and Е. Д. Хилажева and Olga L. Lopatina and Е. А. Пожиленкова and Konstantin A. Shapovalov and Yu. A. Uspenskaya and Alla B. Salmina}, journal = {Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience}, year = {2017}, doi = {10.3389/fnagi.2017.00245}, }

Research neighborhood

References, citing works, and semantically nearest findings. Click a node to open it.

Related findings