Open access · OA
via OpenAlex
Determination of Biological Age: Geriatric Assessment vs Biological Biomarkers
Lucas Diebel, Kenneth Rockwood
Current Oncology Reports · 2021 · ▲ 163 citations
◌ CITATION ONLY
Full text is not openly licensed for redistribution here. Read it at the source:
Provenance
- Source
- OpenAlex
- DOI
- 10.1007/s11912-021-01097-9
- Canonical
- link ↗
- Fetched
- 2026-07-27 MST
Cite this
APA
Diebel, L., & Rockwood, K. (2021). Determination of Biological Age: Geriatric Assessment vs Biological Biomarkers. <em>Current Oncology Reports</em>. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11912-021-01097-9
Vancouver
Diebel L, Rockwood K. Determination of Biological Age: Geriatric Assessment vs Biological Biomarkers. Current Oncology Reports. 2021. doi:10.1007/s11912-021-01097-9.
BibTeX
@article{lucas2021Determ,
title = {Determination of Biological Age: Geriatric Assessment vs Biological Biomarkers},
author = {Lucas Diebel and Kenneth Rockwood},
journal = {Current Oncology Reports},
year = {2021},
doi = {10.1007/s11912-021-01097-9},
}
Research neighborhood
References, citing works, and semantically nearest findings. Click a node to open it.
Related findings
Nature Reviews Genetics 2022
Preprint · OA
Measuring biological age using omics data
Cell Metabolism 2023
Preprint · OA
Biological age is increased by stress and restored upon recovery
Journal of Affective Disorders 2020
Citation only
Frailty Index as a clinical measure of biological age in psychiatry
The Journal of Frailty & Aging 2016
Citation only
FRAILTY ACROSS AGE GROUPS
arXiv (Cornell University) 2026
Preprint · CC-BY
Control Laws in Aging and Longevity: A Control Theory of Aging for Gerotherapeutic Drug Discovery
GeroScience 2023
Preprint · OA