Skip to content
Open access · US-GOV via ClinicalTrials.gov Clinical trial

Comparing Antegrade Versus Retrograde Enemas To Improve Bowel Continence Across the Lifespan in People With Spina Bifida

Authors not listed

David Chu · 2026

Abstract

The goal of this observational study is to learn how different enema programs affect bowel control in children and adults with spina bifida. An enema program involves putting liquid into the large intestine (colon) to help someone poop. The main questions it aims to answer are: 1. How well do different enema programs prevent bowel accidents? 2. How do these enema programs affect independence, bowel symptoms, and quality of life? Researchers will compare two types of enema programs to see which works better and is easier for participants to manage. Participants starting a new enema program will answer online survey questions at 3 different timepoints over the course of 1 year.

◌ CITATION ONLY
Full text is not openly licensed for redistribution here. Read it at the source:

Read at source →

Provenance

Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Canonical
link ↗
Fetched
2026-10-13 MST

Cite this

APA
Anonymous. (2026). Comparing Antegrade Versus Retrograde Enemas To Improve Bowel Continence Across the Lifespan in People With Spina Bifida. <em>David Chu</em>. https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT07390318
Vancouver
Anonymous. Comparing Antegrade Versus Retrograde Enemas To Improve Bowel Continence Across the Lifespan in People With Spina Bifida. David Chu. 2026.
BibTeX
@misc{anon2026Compar, title = {Comparing Antegrade Versus Retrograde Enemas To Improve Bowel Continence Across the Lifespan in People With Spina Bifida}, author = {Anonymous}, journal = {David Chu}, year = {2026}, }

Research neighborhood

References, citing works, and semantically nearest findings. Click a node to open it.

Related findings