Skip to content
Open access · OA via OpenAlex

Comparative genomics and transcriptomics depict ericoid mycorrhizal fungi as versatile saprotrophs and plant mutualists

Elena Martino, Emmanuelle Morin, Gwen‐Aëlle Grelet, Alan Kuo, Annegret Kohler, Stefania Daghino, Kerrie Barry, Nicolas Cichocki, Alicia Clum, Rhyan B. Dockter, Matthieu Hainaut, Rita Kuo, Kurt LaButti, Björn D. Lindahl, Erika Lindquist

New Phytologist · 2018 · ▲ 248 citations

Abstract

Some soil fungi in the Leotiomycetes form ericoid mycorrhizal (ERM) symbioses with Ericaceae. In the harsh habitats in which they occur, ERM plant survival relies on nutrient mobilization from soil organic matter (SOM) by their fungal partners. The characterization of the fungal genetic machinery underpinning both the symbiotic lifestyle and SOM degradation is needed to understand ERM symbiosis functioning and evolution, and its impact on soil carbon (C) turnover. We sequenced the genomes of the ERM fungi Meliniomyces bicolor, M. variabilis, Oidiodendron maius and Rhizoscyphus ericae, and compared their gene repertoires with those of fungi with different lifestyles (ecto- and orchid mycorrhiza, endophytes, saprotrophs, pathogens). We also identified fungal transcripts induced in symbiosis. The ERM fungal gene contents for polysaccharide-degrading enzymes, lipases, proteases and enzymes involved in secondary metabolism are closer to those of saprotrophs and pathogens than to those of ectomycorrhizal symbionts. The fungal genes most highly upregulated in symbiosis are those coding for fungal and plant cell wall-degrading enzymes (CWDEs), lipases, proteases, transporters and mycorrhiza-induced small secreted proteins (MiSSPs). The ERM fungal gene repertoire reveals a capacity for a dual saprotrophic and biotrophic lifestyle. This may reflect an incomplete transition from saprotrophy to the mycorrhizal habit, or a versatile life strategy similar to fungal endophytes.

◌ CITATION ONLY
Full text is not openly licensed for redistribution here. Read it at the source:

Read at source →

Provenance

Source
OpenAlex
DOI
10.1111/nph.14974
Canonical
link ↗
Fetched
2026-07-25 MST

Cite this

APA
Martino, E., Morin, E., Grelet, G., Kuo, A., Kohler, A., Daghino, S., Barry, K., Cichocki, N., Clum, A., Dockter, R.B., Hainaut, M., Kuo, R., LaButti, K., Lindahl, B.D., Lindquist, E., Lipzen, A., Khouja, H., Magnuson, J., Murat, C., &amp; Ohm, R.A. (2018). Comparative genomics and transcriptomics depict ericoid mycorrhizal fungi as versatile saprotrophs and plant mutualists. <em>New Phytologist</em>. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.14974
Vancouver
Martino E, Morin E, Grelet G, Kuo A, Kohler A, Daghino S, et al. Comparative genomics and transcriptomics depict ericoid mycorrhizal fungi as versatile saprotrophs and plant mutualists. New Phytologist. 2018. doi:10.1111/nph.14974.
BibTeX
@article{elena2018Compar, title = {Comparative genomics and transcriptomics depict ericoid mycorrhizal fungi as versatile saprotrophs and plant mutualists}, author = {Elena Martino and Emmanuelle Morin and Gwen‐Aëlle Grelet and Alan Kuo and Annegret Kohler and Stefania Daghino and Kerrie Barry and Nicolas Cichocki and Alicia Clum and Rhyan B. Dockter and Matthieu Hainaut and Rita Kuo and Kurt LaButti and Björn D. Lindahl and Erika Lindquist and Anna Lipzen and Hassine‐Radhouane Khouja and Jon Magnuson and Claude Murat and Robin A. Ohm and Steven W. Singer and Joseph W. Spatafora and Mei Wang and Claire Veneault‐Fourrey and Bernard Henrissat}, journal = {New Phytologist}, year = {2018}, doi = {10.1111/nph.14974}, }

Research neighborhood

References, citing works, and semantically nearest findings. Click a node to open it.

Related findings