Skip to content
Open access · CC-BY via OpenAlex

Comparative Analysis of the Oral Frailty Five-item Checklist and Oral Frailty Index-8 Tools in Assessing Oral Frailty and Their Association with Systemic Health Indicators

Hiroshi Kusunoki, Shotaro Tsuji, Kazumi Ekawa, Nozomi Kato, Keita Yamasaki, Fumiki Yoshihara, Hideo Shimizu

JMA Journal · 2025 · ▲ 2 citations

Abstract

Introduction: Oral frailty, defined as an age-related decline in oral function, represents a significant risk factor for adverse health outcomes, though it can be mitigated through early intervention. The Oral Frailty Five-item Checklist (OF-5), introduced in 2023, assesses oral frailty using 5 indicators: reduced number of teeth, difficulty chewing, difficulty swallowing, dry mouth, and low articulatory oral motor skills. Designed for use beyond dental clinics, the OF-5 has demonstrated predictive validity for physical frailty and mortality. Similarly, the Oral Frailty Index-8 (OFI-8) comprises 8 items evaluating oral health, social participation, and dental habits. Methods: This study compared the OF-5 and OFI-8 tools and investigated their associations with physical and biological markers. A cross-sectional analysis was conducted on 270 Japanese participants aged ≥65 years (median age: 78 years). The assessments included blood tests, physical measurements, and grip strength evaluation. Participants were categorized by sex and oral frailty risk based on OF-5 scores (non-frailty: ≤1; frailty: ≥2). Results: Oral frailty, defined as an OF-5 score ≥2, was observed in 40.7% of the participants (33.8% in men and 47.4% in women). Both the OF-5 and OFI-8 scores were higher in women than in men. Sex-specific differences in physical and biological markers were evident; men exhibited higher grip strength, whereas women had a higher prevalence of anemia and osteoporosis. Women were also more likely to report reduced masticatory ability and lower levels of social participation. A high concordance rate of over 80% was observed between oral frailty (OF-5 score ≥2) and high-risk oral frailty (OFI-8 score ≥4). Conclusions: These findings highlight the utility of subjective questionnaires in assessing oral frailty and emphasize the need for longitudinal studies to evaluate their predictive accuracy for physical frailty.

◌ CITATION ONLY
Full text is not openly licensed for redistribution here. Read it at the source:

Read at source →

Provenance

Source
OpenAlex
DOI
10.31662/jmaj.2025-0057
Canonical
link ↗
Fetched
2026-10-14 MST

Cite this

APA
Kusunoki, H., Tsuji, S., Ekawa, K., Kato, N., Yamasaki, K., Yoshihara, F., &amp; Shimizu, H. (2025). Comparative Analysis of the Oral Frailty Five-item Checklist and Oral Frailty Index-8 Tools in Assessing Oral Frailty and Their Association with Systemic Health Indicators. <em>JMA Journal</em>. https://doi.org/10.31662/jmaj.2025-0057
Vancouver
Kusunoki H, Tsuji S, Ekawa K, Kato N, Yamasaki K, Yoshihara F, et al. Comparative Analysis of the Oral Frailty Five-item Checklist and Oral Frailty Index-8 Tools in Assessing Oral Frailty and Their Association with Systemic Health Indicators. JMA Journal. 2025. doi:10.31662/jmaj.2025-0057.
BibTeX
@article{hiroshi2025Compar, title = {Comparative Analysis of the Oral Frailty Five-item Checklist and Oral Frailty Index-8 Tools in Assessing Oral Frailty and Their Association with Systemic Health Indicators}, author = {Hiroshi Kusunoki and Shotaro Tsuji and Kazumi Ekawa and Nozomi Kato and Keita Yamasaki and Fumiki Yoshihara and Hideo Shimizu}, journal = {JMA Journal}, year = {2025}, doi = {10.31662/jmaj.2025-0057}, }

Research neighborhood

References, citing works, and semantically nearest findings. Click a node to open it.

Related findings