Preprint · CC-BY
via OpenAlex
Clock Work: Deconstructing the Epigenetic Clock Signals in Aging, Disease, and Reprogramming
Morgan E. Levine, Albert Higgins‐Chen, Kyra Thrush, Christopher J. Minteer, Peter Niimi
bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · 2022 · ▲ 65 citations
Epigenetic alterations
Cellular senescence
Partial reprogramming (OSK)
Cell culture / in vitro
In vitro
Abstract
ABSTRACT Epigenetic clocks have come to be regarded as powerful tools for estimating aging. However, a major drawback in their application is our lack of mechanistic understanding. We hypothesize that uncovering the underlying biology is difficult due to the fact that epigenetic clocks are multifactorial composites: They are comprised of disparate parts, each with their own causal mechanism and functional consequences. Thus, only by deconstructing epigenetic clock(definition) signals will it be possible to glean biological insight. Here we clustered 5,717 clock CpGs into twelve distinct modules using multi-tissue and in-vitro datasets. We show that epigenetic clocks are comprised of different proportions of modules, which may explain their discordance when simultaneously applied in a given study. We also observe that epigenetic reprogramming does not ‘reset’ the entire clock and instead the observed rejuvenation is driven by a subset of modules. Overall, two modules stand-out in terms of their unique features. The first is one of the most responsive to epigenetic reprogramming; is the strongest predictor of all-cause mortality; and shows increases with in vitro passaging up until senescence(definition) burden begins to emerge. The light-second module is moderately responsive to reprogramming; is very accelerated in tumor vs. normal tissues; and tracks with passaging in vitro even as population doublings decelerate. Overall, we show that clock deconstruction can identify unique DNAm alterations and facilitate our mechanistic understanding of epigenetic clocks.
◌ CITATION ONLY
Full text is not openly licensed for redistribution here. Read it at the source:
Provenance
- Source
- OpenAlex
- DOI
- 10.1101/2022.02.13.480245
- Canonical
- link ↗
- Fetched
- 2026-07-09 MST
Cite this
APA
Levine, M.E., Higgins‐Chen, A., Thrush, K., Minteer, C.J., & Niimi, P. (2022). Clock Work: Deconstructing the Epigenetic Clock Signals in Aging, Disease, and Reprogramming. <em>bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)</em>. https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.02.13.480245
Vancouver
Levine ME, Higgins‐Chen A, Thrush K, Minteer CJ, Niimi P. Clock Work: Deconstructing the Epigenetic Clock Signals in Aging, Disease, and Reprogramming. bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory). 2022. doi:10.1101/2022.02.13.480245.
BibTeX
@unpublished{morgan2022ClockW,
title = {Clock Work: Deconstructing the Epigenetic Clock Signals in Aging, Disease, and Reprogramming},
author = {Morgan E. Levine and Albert Higgins‐Chen and Kyra Thrush and Christopher J. Minteer and Peter Niimi},
journal = {bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)},
year = {2022},
doi = {10.1101/2022.02.13.480245},
}
Research neighborhood
References, citing works, and semantically nearest findings. Click a node to open it.
Related findings
bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) 2021
Preprint · CC-BY
Epigenetic clocks reveal a rejuvenation event during embryogenesis followed by aging
Elsevier eBooks 2017
Citation only
The Epigenetic Clock and Aging
Chinese Medical Journal 2021
Open access · CC-BY
Epigenetic clocks in the pediatric population: when and why they tick?
Communications Biology 2024
Open access · CC-BY
Development of an epigenetic clock resistant to changes in immune cell composition
Aging Cell 2025
Open access · CC-BY
Cross‐tissue comparison of epigenetic aging clocks in humans
Human Reproduction Update 2022
Citation only