Skip to content
Open access · CC-BY via OpenAlex

Clinical Relevance of Biomarkers of Oxidative Stress

Jeroen Frijhoff, Paul G. Winyard, Neven Žarković, Sean S. Davies, Roland Stocker, David Cheng, Annie R. Knight, Emma Taylor, Jeannette Oettrich, Tatjana Ruskovska, Ana Čipak Gašparović, Antonio Cuadrado, Daniela Weber, Henrik E. Poulsen, Tilman Grune

Antioxidants and Redox Signaling · 2015 · ▲ 902 citations

Abstract

SIGNIFICANCE: Oxidative stress is considered to be an important component of various diseases. A vast number of methods have been developed and used in virtually all diseases to measure the extent and nature of oxidative stress, ranging from oxidation of DNA to proteins, lipids, and free amino acids. RECENT ADVANCES: An increased understanding of the biology behind diseases and redox biology has led to more specific and sensitive tools to measure oxidative stress markers, which are very diverse and sometimes very low in abundance. CRITICAL ISSUES: The literature is very heterogeneous. It is often difficult to draw general conclusions on the significance of oxidative stress biomarkers, as only in a limited proportion of diseases have a range of different biomarkers been used, and different biomarkers have been used to study different diseases. In addition, biomarkers are often measured using nonspecific methods, while specific methodologies are often too sophisticated or laborious for routine clinical use. FUTURE DIRECTIONS: Several markers of oxidative stress still represent a viable biomarker opportunity for clinical use. However, positive findings with currently used biomarkers still need to be validated in larger sample sizes and compared with current clinical standards to establish them as clinical diagnostics. It is important to realize that oxidative stress is a nuanced phenomenon that is difficult to characterize, and one biomarker is not necessarily better than others. The vast diversity in oxidative stress between diseases and conditions has to be taken into account when selecting the most appropriate biomarker.

◌ CITATION ONLY
Full text is not openly licensed for redistribution here. Read it at the source:

Read at source →

Provenance

Source
OpenAlex
DOI
10.1089/ars.2015.6317
Canonical
link ↗
Fetched
2026-07-28 MST

Cite this

APA
Frijhoff, J., Winyard, P.G., Žarković, N., Davies, S.S., Stocker, R., Cheng, D., Knight, A.R., Taylor, E., Oettrich, J., Ruskovska, T., Gašparović, A.�., Cuadrado, A., Weber, D., Poulsen, H.E., Grune, T., Schmidt, H., &amp; Ghezzi, P. (2015). Clinical Relevance of Biomarkers of Oxidative Stress. <em>Antioxidants and Redox Signaling</em>. https://doi.org/10.1089/ars.2015.6317
Vancouver
Frijhoff J, Winyard PG, Žarković N, Davies SS, Stocker R, Cheng D, et al. Clinical Relevance of Biomarkers of Oxidative Stress. Antioxidants and Redox Signaling. 2015. doi:10.1089/ars.2015.6317.
BibTeX
@article{jeroen2015Clinic, title = {Clinical Relevance of Biomarkers of Oxidative Stress}, author = {Jeroen Frijhoff and Paul G. Winyard and Neven Žarković and Sean S. Davies and Roland Stocker and David Cheng and Annie R. Knight and Emma Taylor and Jeannette Oettrich and Tatjana Ruskovska and Ana Čipak Gašparović and Antonio Cuadrado and Daniela Weber and Henrik E. Poulsen and Tilman Grune and Harald Schmidt and Pietro Ghezzi}, journal = {Antioxidants and Redox Signaling}, year = {2015}, doi = {10.1089/ars.2015.6317}, }

Research neighborhood

References, citing works, and semantically nearest findings. Click a node to open it.