Open access · CC-BY
via OpenAlex
Clinical biomarker-based biological aging and risk of cancer in the UK Biobank
Jonathan K. L. Mak, Christopher E McMurran, Ralf Kuja‐Halkola, Per Hall, Kamila Czene, Juulia Jylhävä, Sara Hägg
British Journal of Cancer · 2023 · ▲ 153 citations
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Despite a clear link between aging and cancer, there has been inconclusive evidence on how biological age (BA) may be associated with cancer incidence. METHODS: We studied 308,156 UK Biobank participants with no history of cancer at enrolment. Using 18 age-associated clinical biomarkers, we computed three BA measures (Klemera-Doubal method [KDM], PhenoAge, homeostatic dysregulation [HD]) and assessed their associations with incidence of any cancer and five common cancers (breast, prostate, lung, colorectal, and melanoma) using Cox proportional-hazards models. RESULTS: A total of 35,426 incident cancers were documented during a median follow-up of 10.9 years. Adjusting for common cancer risk factors, 1-standard deviation (SD) increment in the age-adjusted KDM (hazard ratio = 1.04, 95% confidence interval = 1.03-1.05), age-adjusted PhenoAge (1.09, 1.07-1.10), and HD (1.02, 1.01-1.03) was significantly associated with a higher risk of any cancer. All BA measures were also associated with increased risks of lung and colorectal cancers, but only PhenoAge was associated with breast cancer risk. Furthermore, we observed an inverse association between BA measures and prostate cancer, although it was attenuated after removing glycated hemoglobin and serum glucose from the BA algorithms. CONCLUSIONS: Advanced BA quantified by clinical biomarkers is associated with increased risks of any cancer, lung cancer, and colorectal cancer.
◌ CITATION ONLY
Full text is not openly licensed for redistribution here. Read it at the source:
Provenance
- Source
- OpenAlex
- DOI
- 10.1038/s41416-023-02288-w
- Canonical
- link ↗
- Fetched
- 2026-07-25 MST
Cite this
APA
Mak, J.K.L., McMurran, C.E., Kuja‐Halkola, R., Hall, P., Czene, K., Jylhävä, J., & Hägg, S. (2023). Clinical biomarker-based biological aging and risk of cancer in the UK Biobank. <em>British Journal of Cancer</em>. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41416-023-02288-w
Vancouver
Mak JKL, McMurran CE, Kuja‐Halkola R, Hall P, Czene K, Jylhävä J, et al. Clinical biomarker-based biological aging and risk of cancer in the UK Biobank. British Journal of Cancer. 2023. doi:10.1038/s41416-023-02288-w.
BibTeX
@article{jonathan2023Clinic,
title = {Clinical biomarker-based biological aging and risk of cancer in the UK Biobank},
author = {Jonathan K. L. Mak and Christopher E McMurran and Ralf Kuja‐Halkola and Per Hall and Kamila Czene and Juulia Jylhävä and Sara Hägg},
journal = {British Journal of Cancer},
year = {2023},
doi = {10.1038/s41416-023-02288-w},
}
Research neighborhood
References, citing works, and semantically nearest findings. Click a node to open it.
Related findings
International Journal of Cancer 2017
Open access · OA
DNA methylation‐based biological aging and cancer risk and survival: Pooled analysis of seven prospective studies
Clinical epigenetics 2026
Open access · OA
Later-generation epigenetic aging clocks outperform first-generation models in predicting survival in TCGA breast cancer.
The Journals of Gerontology Series A 2017
Open access · OA
Measures of Biologic Age in a Community Sample Predict Mortality and Age-Related Disease: The Framingham Offspring Study
JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute 2019
Preprint · CC0
Methylation-Based Biological Age and Breast Cancer Risk
The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences 2026
Open access · OA
Utility of biological aging markers for mortality risk stratification in community-dwelling older adults: insights from the Mr. OS and Ms. OS (Hong Kong) cohort.
BMC Medicine 2019
Open access · CC-BY