Skip to content
Preprint · OA via OpenAlex

An operational approach to National Institute on Aging–Alzheimer's Association criteria for preclinical Alzheimer disease

Clifford R. Jack, David S. Knopman, Stephen D. Weigand, Heather J. Wiste, Prashanthi Vemuri, Val J. Lowe, Kejal Kantarci, Jeffrey L. Gunter, Matthew L. Senjem, Robert J. Ivnik, Rosebud O. Roberts, Walter A. Rocca, Bradley F. Boeve, Ronald Carl Petersen

Annals of Neurology · 2011 · ▲ 602 citations

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: A workgroup commissioned by the Alzheimer's Association (AA) and the National Institute on Aging (NIA) recently published research criteria for preclinical Alzheimer disease (AD). We performed a preliminary assessment of these guidelines. METHODS: We employed Pittsburgh compound B positron emission tomography (PET) imaging as our biomarker of cerebral amyloidosis, and (18) fluorodeoxyglucose PET imaging and hippocampal volume as biomarkers of neurodegeneration. A group of 42 clinically diagnosed AD subjects was used to create imaging biomarker cutpoints. A group of 450 cognitively normal (CN) subjects from a population-based sample was used to develop cognitive cutpoints and to assess population frequencies of the different preclinical AD stages using different cutpoint criteria. RESULTS: The new criteria subdivide the preclinical phase of AD into stages 1 to 3. To classify our CN subjects, 2 additional categories were needed. Stage 0 denotes subjects with normal AD biomarkers and no evidence of subtle cognitive impairment. Suspected non-AD pathophysiology (SNAP) denotes subjects with normal amyloid PET imaging, but abnormal neurodegeneration biomarker studies. At fixed cutpoints corresponding to 90% sensitivity for diagnosing AD and the 10th percentile of CN cognitive scores, 43% of our sample was classified as stage 0, 16% stage 1, 12 % stage 2, 3% stage 3, and 23% SNAP. INTERPRETATION: This cross-sectional evaluation of the NIA-AA criteria for preclinical AD indicates that the 1-3 staging criteria coupled with stage 0 and SNAP categories classify 97% of CN subjects from a population-based sample, leaving only 3% unclassified. Future longitudinal validation of the criteria will be important.

◌ CITATION ONLY
Full text is not openly licensed for redistribution here. Read it at the source:

Read at source →

Provenance

Source
OpenAlex
DOI
10.1002/ana.22628
Canonical
link ↗
Fetched
2026-10-29 MST

Cite this

APA
Jack, C.R., Knopman, D.S., Weigand, S.D., Wiste, H.J., Vemuri, P., Lowe, V.J., Kantarci, K., Gunter, J.L., Senjem, M.L., Ivnik, R.J., Roberts, R.O., Rocca, W.A., Boeve, B.F., &amp; Petersen, R.C. (2011). An operational approach to National Institute on Aging–Alzheimer's Association criteria for preclinical Alzheimer disease. <em>Annals of Neurology</em>. https://doi.org/10.1002/ana.22628
Vancouver
Jack CR, Knopman DS, Weigand SD, Wiste HJ, Vemuri P, Lowe VJ, et al. An operational approach to National Institute on Aging–Alzheimer's Association criteria for preclinical Alzheimer disease. Annals of Neurology. 2011. doi:10.1002/ana.22628.
BibTeX
@unpublished{clifford2011Anoper, title = {An operational approach to National Institute on Aging–Alzheimer's Association criteria for preclinical Alzheimer disease}, author = {Clifford R. Jack and David S. Knopman and Stephen D. Weigand and Heather J. Wiste and Prashanthi Vemuri and Val J. Lowe and Kejal Kantarci and Jeffrey L. Gunter and Matthew L. Senjem and Robert J. Ivnik and Rosebud O. Roberts and Walter A. Rocca and Bradley F. Boeve and Ronald Carl Petersen}, journal = {Annals of Neurology}, year = {2011}, doi = {10.1002/ana.22628}, }

Research neighborhood

References, citing works, and semantically nearest findings. Click a node to open it.

Related findings