Open access · US-GOV via ClinicalTrials.gov Clinical trial

A Phase 1B Study to Assess the Safety and Efficacy of Two Formulations of ELAPR Compared to Restylane® Vital Light Following Repeat Implants in the Upper Arm Dermis

Authors not listed

Elastagen Pty Ltd · 2011

Stem-cell exhaustion Human Randomized controlled trial

Abstract

This is an early phase study comparing two fixed dose of the study compound ELAPR and a Restylane® Vital Light (control), by multiple intradermal injections to a 3cm x 3cm area of the upper arm dermis. All subjects will receive three treatments, 3 weeks apart. Each treatment will consist of 16 injections in total, each 10mm apart in a grid formation over a 3cm x 3cm area of the mid - to deep dermis of the medial aspect of the upper arm. Each injection will consist of 20-30ul of product delivered using a 30Gx¼" needle.

◌ CITATION ONLY
Full text is not openly licensed for redistribution here. Read it at the source:

Read at source →

Provenance

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov
Canonical: link ↗
Fetched: 2026-10-07 MST

Cite this

APA

Anonymous. (2011). A Phase 1B Study to Assess the Safety and Efficacy of Two Formulations of ELAPR Compared to Restylane® Vital Light Following Repeat Implants in the Upper Arm Dermis. <em>Elastagen Pty Ltd</em>. https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT01466413

Vancouver

Anonymous. A Phase 1B Study to Assess the Safety and Efficacy of Two Formulations of ELAPR Compared to Restylane® Vital Light Following Repeat Implants in the Upper Arm Dermis. Elastagen Pty Ltd. 2011.

BibTeX

@misc{anon2011APhase, title = {A Phase 1B Study to Assess the Safety and Efficacy of Two Formulations of ELAPR Compared to Restylane® Vital Light Following Repeat Implants in the Upper Arm Dermis}, author = {Anonymous}, journal = {Elastagen Pty Ltd}, year = {2011}, }