Skip to content
Open access · OA via OpenAlex

A concise revised Myeloma Comorbidity Index as a valid prognostic instrument in a large cohort of 801 multiple myeloma patients

Monika Engelhardt, Anne-Saskia Domm, Sandra Maria Dold, Gabriele Ihorst, Heike Reinhardt, Alexander Zober, Stefanie Hieke, Corine Baayen, Stefan J. Müller, Hermann Einsele, Pieter Sonneveld, Ola Landgren, Martin Schumacher, Ralph Wäsch

Haematologica · 2017 · ▲ 272 citations

Abstract

With growing numbers of elderly multiple myeloma patients, reliable tools to assess their vulnerability are required. The objective of the analysis herein was to develop and validate an easy to use myeloma risk score (revised Myeloma Comorbidity Index) that allows for risk prediction of overall survival and progression-free survival differences in a large patient cohort. We conducted a comprehensive comorbidity, frailty and disability evaluation in 801 consecutive myeloma patients, including comorbidity risks obtained at diagnosis. The cohort was examined within a training and validation set. Multivariate analysis determined renal, lung and Karnofsky Performance Status impairment, frailty and age as significant risks for overall survival. These were combined in a weighted revised Myeloma Comorbidity Index, allowing for the identification of fit (revised Myeloma Comorbidity Index ≤3 [n=247, 30.8%]), intermediate-fit (revised Myeloma Comorbidity Index 4–6 [n=446, 55.7%]) and frail patients (revised Myeloma Comorbidity Index >6 [n=108, 13.5%]): these subgroups, confirmed via validation analysis, showed median overall survival rates of 10.1, 4.4 and 1.2 years, respectively. The revised Myeloma Comorbidity Index was compared to other commonly used comorbidity indices (Charlson Comorbidity Index, Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation-Specific Comorbidity Index, Kaplan-Feinstein Index): if each were divided in risk groups based on 25% and 75% quartiles, highest hazard ratios, best prediction and Brier scores were achieved with the revised Myeloma Comorbidity Index. The advantages of the revised Myeloma Comorbidity Index include its accurate assessment of patients’ physical conditions and simple clinical applicability. We propose the revised Myeloma Comorbidity Index to be tested with the “reference” International Myeloma Working Group frailty score in multicenter analyses and future clinical trials. The study was registered at the German Clinical Trials Register (DRKS-00003868).

◌ CITATION ONLY
Full text is not openly licensed for redistribution here. Read it at the source:

Read at source →

Provenance

Source
OpenAlex
DOI
10.3324/haematol.2016.162693
Canonical
link ↗
Fetched
2026-07-25 MST

Cite this

APA
Engelhardt, M., Domm, A., Dold, S.M., Ihorst, G., Reinhardt, H., Zober, A., Hieke, S., Baayen, C., Müller, S.J., Einsele, H., Sonneveld, P., Landgren, O., Schumacher, M., &amp; Wäsch, R. (2017). A concise revised Myeloma Comorbidity Index as a valid prognostic instrument in a large cohort of 801 multiple myeloma patients. <em>Haematologica</em>. https://doi.org/10.3324/haematol.2016.162693
Vancouver
Engelhardt M, Domm A, Dold SM, Ihorst G, Reinhardt H, Zober A, et al. A concise revised Myeloma Comorbidity Index as a valid prognostic instrument in a large cohort of 801 multiple myeloma patients. Haematologica. 2017. doi:10.3324/haematol.2016.162693.
BibTeX
@article{monika2017Aconci, title = {A concise revised Myeloma Comorbidity Index as a valid prognostic instrument in a large cohort of 801 multiple myeloma patients}, author = {Monika Engelhardt and Anne-Saskia Domm and Sandra Maria Dold and Gabriele Ihorst and Heike Reinhardt and Alexander Zober and Stefanie Hieke and Corine Baayen and Stefan J. Müller and Hermann Einsele and Pieter Sonneveld and Ola Landgren and Martin Schumacher and Ralph Wäsch}, journal = {Haematologica}, year = {2017}, doi = {10.3324/haematol.2016.162693}, }

Research neighborhood

References, citing works, and semantically nearest findings. Click a node to open it.

Related findings