Open access · US-GOV via ClinicalTrials.gov Clinical trial

A Comparison of Two Different Surgical Techniques to Preserve the Bony Supply and Improve Implant Longevity in Hip Resurfacing Arthroplasty

Authors not listed

University of Aarhus · 2008

Telomere attrition Human Randomized controlled trial

Abstract

The purpose of the study is to compare two different surgical techniques in hip resurfacing arthroplasty (RHA), comparing bloodflow and metabolism in the femoral head, as well as implant migration, periprosthetic bone mineral density, gait function and patient recovery.

◌ CITATION ONLY
Full text is not openly licensed for redistribution here. Read it at the source:

Read at source →

Provenance

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov
Canonical: link ↗
Fetched: 2026-10-19 MST

Cite this

APA

Anonymous. (2008). A Comparison of Two Different Surgical Techniques to Preserve the Bony Supply and Improve Implant Longevity in Hip Resurfacing Arthroplasty. <em>University of Aarhus</em>. https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT00913679

Vancouver

Anonymous. A Comparison of Two Different Surgical Techniques to Preserve the Bony Supply and Improve Implant Longevity in Hip Resurfacing Arthroplasty. University of Aarhus. 2008.

BibTeX

@misc{anon2008ACompa, title = {A Comparison of Two Different Surgical Techniques to Preserve the Bony Supply and Improve Implant Longevity in Hip Resurfacing Arthroplasty}, author = {Anonymous}, journal = {University of Aarhus}, year = {2008}, }