Skip to content
Citation only via OpenAlex

208 Biological, Not Chronological: PhenoAge Outperforms Conventional Frailty Indices in Predicting 30-Day Morbidity After Surgical Stabilization of Spinal Cord Injury

Arjun Kumar Menta, Ritvik Jillala, Carlos Andres Aude, Tej Deepak Azad, Patrick J. Kramer, Vikas N. Vattipally, Antony A. Fuleihan, Daniel Davidar, Meghana Bhimreddy, Joseph M. Dardick, Nicholas Theodore

Neurosurgery · 2026

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Surgery for acute spinal cord injury (SCI) entails considerable peri-operative risk, yet standard neurosurgical frailty tools discriminate poorly. Biological age clocks such as PhenoAge—derived from routine laboratory biomarkers—may better reflect physiological reserve. METHODS: SCI operations in the ACS-NSQIP (2016-2020) were analyzed. PhenoAge, derived from nine routine labs and trained on NHANES, and frailty scores were computed per published algorithms. Outcomes were 30-day mortality and morbidity. Multivariable logistic and Cox models were adjusted for demographics, ASA class, urgency, and procedure category. Models were compared using C-index, likelihood-ratio Δχ2, categorical net reclassification improvement (NRI), and Boruta random-forest variable importance. RESULTS: The cohort comprised 45,332 patients (median age 56 years; 53% male); 30-day morbidity and mortality were 7.8% and 0.3%, respectively. PhenoAge outperformed chronological age—mortality: HR 3.08, C-index 0.886, LR χ2 = 31.9 vs age HR 2.63, C-index 0.880; morbidity: HR 1.26, C-index 0.699, LR χ2 = 53.5 vs age HR 1.19, C-index 0.696—and, when both were entered, age lost prognostic value (mortality HR 0.71, morbidity HR 0.75). The highest PhenoAge decile showed 3.8× more complications and 67× higher mortality than the lowest. PhenoAge dominated mortality prediction (C-index 0.882, Δχ2=35) versus RAI 0.875/1, revised-RAI 0.874/5, and mFI-5 0.878/0, achieving an NRI +4.4%—≥4% higher than any comparator; morbidity results paralleled this pattern (0.695/92 vs 0.694/69, 0.693/54, 0.694/67; NRI +2.3%). Boruta ranked PhenoAge as the top predictor. CONCLUSIONS: In SCI surgery, biological age captured by PhenoAge surpasses chronological age and leading frailty scores for short-term outcome prediction. Requiring only standard pre-operative labs, PhenoAge could enhance counseling, drive targeted optimization, and refine risk adjustment in neurosurgical research.

◌ CITATION ONLY
Full text is not openly licensed for redistribution here. Read it at the source:

Read at source →

Provenance

Source
OpenAlex
DOI
10.1227/neu.0000000000003964_208
Canonical
link ↗
Fetched
2026-10-15 MST

Cite this

APA
Menta, A.K., Jillala, R., Aude, C.A., Azad, T.D., Kramer, P.J., Vattipally, V.N., Fuleihan, A.A., Davidar, D., Bhimreddy, M., Dardick, J.M., &amp; Theodore, N. (2026). 208 Biological, Not Chronological: PhenoAge Outperforms Conventional Frailty Indices in Predicting 30-Day Morbidity After Surgical Stabilization of Spinal Cord Injury. <em>Neurosurgery</em>. https://doi.org/10.1227/neu.0000000000003964_208
Vancouver
Menta AK, Jillala R, Aude CA, Azad TD, Kramer PJ, Vattipally VN, et al. 208 Biological, Not Chronological: PhenoAge Outperforms Conventional Frailty Indices in Predicting 30-Day Morbidity After Surgical Stabilization of Spinal Cord Injury. Neurosurgery. 2026. doi:10.1227/neu.0000000000003964_208.
BibTeX
@article{arjun2026Biolog, title = {208 Biological, Not Chronological: PhenoAge Outperforms Conventional Frailty Indices in Predicting 30-Day Morbidity After Surgical Stabilization of Spinal Cord Injury}, author = {Arjun Kumar Menta and Ritvik Jillala and Carlos Andres Aude and Tej Deepak Azad and Patrick J. Kramer and Vikas N. Vattipally and Antony A. Fuleihan and Daniel Davidar and Meghana Bhimreddy and Joseph M. Dardick and Nicholas Theodore}, journal = {Neurosurgery}, year = {2026}, doi = {10.1227/neu.0000000000003964_208}, }

Research neighborhood

References, citing works, and semantically nearest findings. Click a node to open it.

Related findings