Preprint · CC-BY
via OpenAlex
Neighborhood environment, social cohesion, and epigenetic aging
Chantel L. Martin, Cavin Ward‐Caviness, Radhika Dhingra, Tarek M. Zikry, Sandro Galea, Derek E. Wildman, Karestan C. Koenen, Monica Uddin, Allison E. Aiello
Aging · 2021 · ▲ 49 citations
Abstract
Living in adverse neighborhood environments has been linked to risk of aging-related diseases and mortality; however, the biological mechanisms explaining this observation remain poorly understood. DNA methylation (DNAm), a proposed mechanism and biomarker of biological aging responsive to environmental stressors, offers promising insight into potential molecular pathways. We examined associations between three neighborhood social environment measures (poverty, quality, and social cohesion) and three epigenetic clocks (Horvath, Hannum, and PhenoAge) using data from the Detroit Neighborhood Health Study (n=158). Using linear regression models, we evaluated associations in the total sample and stratified by sex and social cohesion. Neighborhood quality was associated with accelerated DNAm aging for Horvath age acceleration (β = 1.8; 95% CI: 0.4, 3.1), Hannum age acceleration (β = 1.7; 95% CI: 0.4, 3.0), and PhenoAge acceleration (β = 2.1; 95% CI: 0.4, 3.8). In models stratified on social cohesion, associations of neighborhood poverty and quality with accelerated DNAm aging remained elevated for residents living in neighborhoods with lower social cohesion, but were null for those living in neighborhoods with higher social cohesion. Our study suggests that living in adverse neighborhood environments can speed up epigenetic aging, while positive neighborhood attributes may buffer effects.
◌ CITATION ONLY
Full text is not openly licensed for redistribution here. Read it at the source:
Provenance
- Source
- OpenAlex
- DOI
- 10.18632/aging.202814
- Canonical
- link ↗
- Fetched
- 2026-07-22 MST
Cite this
APA
Martin, C.L., Ward‐Caviness, C., Dhingra, R., Zikry, T.M., Galea, S., Wildman, D.E., Koenen, K.C., Uddin, M., & Aiello, A.E. (2021). Neighborhood environment, social cohesion, and epigenetic aging. <em>Aging</em>. https://doi.org/10.18632/aging.202814
Vancouver
Martin CL, Ward‐Caviness C, Dhingra R, Zikry TM, Galea S, Wildman DE, et al. Neighborhood environment, social cohesion, and epigenetic aging. Aging. 2021. doi:10.18632/aging.202814.
BibTeX
@unpublished{chantel2021Neighb,
title = {Neighborhood environment, social cohesion, and epigenetic aging},
author = {Chantel L. Martin and Cavin Ward‐Caviness and Radhika Dhingra and Tarek M. Zikry and Sandro Galea and Derek E. Wildman and Karestan C. Koenen and Monica Uddin and Allison E. Aiello},
journal = {Aging},
year = {2021},
doi = {10.18632/aging.202814},
}
Research neighborhood
References, citing works, and semantically nearest findings. Click a node to open it.
Related findings
Aging 2019
Preprint · CC-BY
Socioeconomic position, lifestyle habits and biomarkers of epigenetic aging: a multi-cohort analysis
Aging cell 2026
Open access · OA
Associations Between 40-Year Trajectories of BMI and Proteomic and Epigenetic Aging Clocks: Deciphering Nonlinearity and Interactions.
The Journals of Gerontology Series A 2023
Open access · CC-BY
Epigenetic and Metabolomic Biomarkers for Biological Age: A Comparative Analysis of Mortality and Frailty Risk
Clinical Epigenetics 2020
Open access · CC-BY
Estimating breast tissue-specific DNA methylation age using next-generation sequencing data
Aging Cell 2022
Open access · CC-BY
The metabolome as a biomarker of aging in <i>Drosophila melanogaster</i>
Aging Cell 2015
Open access · CC-BY