Skip to content
Open access · CC-BY via OpenAlex

Evaluation of multiple transcriptomic gene risk signatures in male breast cancer

Jane Bayani, Coralie Poncet, Cheryl Crozier, Anouk Neven, Tammy Piper, Carrie Cunningham, Monika Sobol, Stefan Paul Aebi, Kim Benstead, Oliver Bögler, Lissandra Dal Lago, Judith Fraser, Florentine Hilbers, Ingrid A. Hedenfalk, Larissa A. Korde

npj Breast Cancer · 2021 · ▲ 10 citations

Abstract

Male breast cancer (BCa) is a rare disease accounting for less than 1% of all breast cancers and 1% of all cancers in males. The clinical management is largely extrapolated from female BCa. Several multigene assays are increasingly used to guide clinical treatment decisions in female BCa, however, there are limited data on the utility of these tests in male BCa. Here we present the gene expression results of 381 M0, ER+ve, HER2-ve male BCa patients enrolled in the Part 1 (retrospective analysis) of the International Male Breast Cancer Program. Using a custom NanoString™ panel comprised of the genes from the commercial risk tests Prosigna®, OncotypeDX®, and MammaPrint®, risk scores and intrinsic subtyping data were generated to recapitulate the commercial tests as described by us previously. We also examined the prognostic value of other risk scores such as the Genomic Grade Index (GGI), IHC4-mRNA and our prognostic 95-gene signature. In this sample set of male BCa, we demonstrated prognostic utility on univariate analysis. Across all signatures, patients whose samples were identified as low-risk experienced better outcomes than intermediate-risk, with those classed as high risk experiencing the poorest outcomes. As seen with female BCa, the concordance between tests was poor, with C-index values ranging from 40.3% to 78.2% and Kappa values ranging from 0.17 to 0.58. To our knowledge, this is the largest study of male breast cancers assayed to generate risk scores of the current commercial and academic risk tests demonstrating comparable clinical utility to female BCa.

◌ CITATION ONLY
Full text is not openly licensed for redistribution here. Read it at the source:

Read at source →

Provenance

Source
OpenAlex
DOI
10.1038/s41523-021-00301-0
Canonical
link ↗
Fetched
2026-10-15 MST

Cite this

APA
Bayani, J., Poncet, C., Crozier, C., Neven, A., Piper, T., Cunningham, C., Sobol, M., Aebi, S.P., Benstead, K., Bögler, O., Lago, L.D., Fraser, J., Hilbers, F., Hedenfalk, I.A., Korde, L.A., Linderholm, B.K., Martens, J.W., Middleton, L.P., Murray, M.P., &amp; Kelly, C.M. (2021). Evaluation of multiple transcriptomic gene risk signatures in male breast cancer. <em>npj Breast Cancer</em>. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41523-021-00301-0
Vancouver
Bayani J, Poncet C, Crozier C, Neven A, Piper T, Cunningham C, et al. Evaluation of multiple transcriptomic gene risk signatures in male breast cancer. npj Breast Cancer. 2021. doi:10.1038/s41523-021-00301-0.
BibTeX
@article{jane2021Evalua, title = {Evaluation of multiple transcriptomic gene risk signatures in male breast cancer}, author = {Jane Bayani and Coralie Poncet and Cheryl Crozier and Anouk Neven and Tammy Piper and Carrie Cunningham and Monika Sobol and Stefan Paul Aebi and Kim Benstead and Oliver Bögler and Lissandra Dal Lago and Judith Fraser and Florentine Hilbers and Ingrid A. Hedenfalk and Larissa A. Korde and Barbro Kristina Linderholm and John W.M. Martens and Lavinia P. Middleton and Melissa P. Murray and Catherine Margaret Kelly and Cecilia Nilsson and Monika Nowaczyk and Stéphanie Peeters and Aleksandra Peric and Peggy L. Porter}, journal = {npj Breast Cancer}, year = {2021}, doi = {10.1038/s41523-021-00301-0}, }

Research neighborhood

References, citing works, and semantically nearest findings. Click a node to open it.

Related findings