Open access · CC-BY
via OpenAlex
Do Epigenetic Clocks Provide Explanations for Sex Differences in Life Span? A Cross-Sectional Twin Study
Anna Kankaanpää, Asko Tolvanen, Pirkko Saikkonen, Aino Heikkinen, Eija K. Laakkonen, Jaakko Kaprio, Miina Ollikainen, Elina Sillanpää
The Journals of Gerontology Series A · 2021 · ▲ 54 citations
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The sex gap in life expectancy has been narrowing in Finland over the past 4-5 decades; however, on average, women still live longer than men. Epigenetic clocks are markers for biological aging which predict life span. In this study, we examined the mediating role of lifestyle factors on the association between sex and biological aging in younger and older adults. METHODS: Our sample consists of younger and older twins (21‒42 years, n = 1 477; 50‒76 years, n = 763) including 151 complete younger opposite-sex twin pairs (21‒30 years). Blood-based DNA methylation was used to compute epigenetic age acceleration by 4 epigenetic clocks as a measure of biological aging. Path modeling was used to study whether the association between sex and biological aging is mediated through lifestyle-related factors, that is, education, body mass index, smoking, alcohol use, and physical activity. RESULTS: In comparison to women, men were biologically older and, in general, they had unhealthier life habits. The effect of sex on biological aging was partly mediated by body mass index and, in older twins, by smoking. Sex was directly associated with biological aging and the association was stronger in older twins. CONCLUSIONS: Previously reported sex differences in life span are also evident in biological aging. Declining smoking prevalence among men is a plausible explanation for the narrowing of the difference in life expectancy between the sexes. Data generated by the epigenetic clocks may help in estimating the effects of lifestyle and environmental factors on aging and in predicting aging in future generations.
◌ CITATION ONLY
Full text is not openly licensed for redistribution here. Read it at the source:
Provenance
- Source
- OpenAlex
- DOI
- 10.1093/gerona/glab337
- Canonical
- link ↗
- Fetched
- 2026-07-15 MST
Cite this
APA
Kankaanpää, A., Tolvanen, A., Saikkonen, P., Heikkinen, A., Laakkonen, E.K., Kaprio, J., Ollikainen, M., & Sillanpää, E. (2021). Do Epigenetic Clocks Provide Explanations for Sex Differences in Life Span? A Cross-Sectional Twin Study. <em>The Journals of Gerontology Series A</em>. https://doi.org/10.1093/gerona/glab337
Vancouver
Kankaanpää A, Tolvanen A, Saikkonen P, Heikkinen A, Laakkonen EK, Kaprio J, et al. Do Epigenetic Clocks Provide Explanations for Sex Differences in Life Span? A Cross-Sectional Twin Study. The Journals of Gerontology Series A. 2021. doi:10.1093/gerona/glab337.
BibTeX
@article{anna2021DoEpig,
title = {Do Epigenetic Clocks Provide Explanations for Sex Differences in Life Span? A Cross-Sectional Twin Study},
author = {Anna Kankaanpää and Asko Tolvanen and Pirkko Saikkonen and Aino Heikkinen and Eija K. Laakkonen and Jaakko Kaprio and Miina Ollikainen and Elina Sillanpää},
journal = {The Journals of Gerontology Series A},
year = {2021},
doi = {10.1093/gerona/glab337},
}
Research neighborhood
References, citing works, and semantically nearest findings. Click a node to open it.
Related findings
Clinical Epigenetics 2019
Open access · CC-BY
Leisure-time physical activity and DNA methylation age—a twin study
Scientific Reports 2019
Open access · CC-BY
DNA methylation-based biological age, genome-wide average DNA methylation, and conventional breast cancer risk factors
Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) 2026
Citation only
Sex-Specific Associations Between Sarcopenia and Obesity Parameters and Falls in Korean Older Adults: A Cross-Sectional Analysis of the Korean Frailty and Aging Cohort Study.
Human Reproduction 2019
Open access · OA
Reproduction, DNA methylation and biological age
The Journals of Gerontology Series A 2019
Preprint · CC-BY
A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Environmental, Lifestyle, and Health Factors Associated With DNA Methylation Age
JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute 2019
Preprint · CC0