Skip to content
Open access · CC-BY via OpenAlex

Diagnostic markers of urothelial cancer based on DNA methylation analysis

Yoshitomo Chihara, Yae Kanai, Hiroyuki Fujimoto, Kokichi Sugano, Kiyotaka Kawashima, Gangning Liang, Peter A. Jones, Kiyohide Fujimoto, Hiroki Kuniyasu, Yoshihiko Hirao

BMC Cancer · 2013 · ▲ 50 citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Early detection and risk assessment are crucial for treating urothelial cancer (UC), which is characterized by a high recurrence rate, and necessitates frequent and invasive monitoring. We aimed to establish diagnostic markers for UC based on DNA methylation. METHODS: In this multi-center study, three independent sample sets were prepared. First, DNA methylation levels at CpG loci were measured in the training sets (tumor samples from 91 UC patients, corresponding normal-appearing tissue from these patients, and 12 normal tissues from age-matched bladder cancer-free patients) using the Illumina Golden Gate methylation assay to identify differentially methylated loci. Next, these methylated loci were validated by quantitative DNA methylation by pyrosequencing, using another cohort of tissue samples (Tissue validation set). Lastly, methylation of these markers was analyzed in the independent urine samples (Urine validation set). ROC analysis was performed to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of these 12 selected markers. RESULTS: Of the 1303 CpG sites, 158 were hyper ethylated and 356 were hypo ethylated in tumor tissues compared to normal tissues. In the panel analysis, 12 loci showed remarkable alterations between tumor and normal samples, with 94.3% sensitivity and 97.8% specificity. Similarly, corresponding normal tissue could be distinguished from normal tissues with 76.0% sensitivity and 100% specificity. Furthermore, the diagnostic accuracy for UC of these markers determined in urine samples was high, with 100% sensitivity and 100% specificity. CONCLUSION: Based on these preliminary findings, diagnostic markers based on differential DNA methylation at specific loci can be useful for non-invasive and reliable detection of UC and epigenetic field defect.

◌ CITATION ONLY
Full text is not openly licensed for redistribution here. Read it at the source:

Read at source →

Provenance

Source
OpenAlex
DOI
10.1186/1471-2407-13-275
Canonical
link ↗
Fetched
2026-06-03 MST

Cite this

APA
Chihara, Y., Kanai, Y., Fujimoto, H., Sugano, K., Kawashima, K., Liang, G., Jones, P.A., Fujimoto, K., Kuniyasu, H., &amp; Hirao, Y. (2013). Diagnostic markers of urothelial cancer based on DNA methylation analysis. <em>BMC Cancer</em>. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2407-13-275
Vancouver
Chihara Y, Kanai Y, Fujimoto H, Sugano K, Kawashima K, Liang G, et al. Diagnostic markers of urothelial cancer based on DNA methylation analysis. BMC Cancer. 2013. doi:10.1186/1471-2407-13-275.
BibTeX
@article{yoshitomo2013Diagno, title = {Diagnostic markers of urothelial cancer based on DNA methylation analysis}, author = {Yoshitomo Chihara and Yae Kanai and Hiroyuki Fujimoto and Kokichi Sugano and Kiyotaka Kawashima and Gangning Liang and Peter A. Jones and Kiyohide Fujimoto and Hiroki Kuniyasu and Yoshihiko Hirao}, journal = {BMC Cancer}, year = {2013}, doi = {10.1186/1471-2407-13-275}, }

Research neighborhood

References, citing works, and semantically nearest findings. Click a node to open it.

Related findings