Skip to content
Open access · CC-BY via OpenAlex

Associations between maternal risk factors of adverse pregnancy and birth outcomes and the offspring epigenetic clock of gestational age at birth

Polina Girchenko, Jari Lahti, Darina Czamara, Anna K. Knight, Meaghan J. Jones, Anna Suarez, Esa Hämäläinen, Eero Kajantie, Hannele Laivuori, Pia Villa, Rebecca M. Reynolds, Michael S. Kobor, Alicia K. Smith, Elisabeth B. Binder, Katri Räikkönen

Clinical Epigenetics · 2017 · ▲ 114 citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND: A recent study has shown that it is possible to accurately estimate gestational age (GA) at birth from the DNA methylation (DNAm) of fetal umbilical cord blood/newborn blood spots. This DNAm GA predictor may provide additional information relevant to developmental stage. In 814 mother-neonate pairs, we evaluated the associations between DNAm GA and a number of maternal and offspring characteristics. These characteristics reflect prenatal environmental adversity and are expected to influence newborn developmental stage. RESULTS: DNAm GA acceleration (GAA; i.e., older DNAm GA than chronological GA) of the offspring at birth was associated with maternal age of over 40 years at delivery, pre-eclampsia and fetal demise in a previous pregnancy, maternal pre-eclampsia and treatment with antenatal betamethasone in the index pregnancy, lower neonatal birth size, lower 1-min Apgar score, and female sex. DNAm GA deceleration (GAD; i.e., younger DNAm GA than chronological GA) of the offspring at birth was associated with insulin-treated gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) in a previous pregnancy and Sjögren's syndrome. These findings were more accentuated when the DNAm GA calculation was based on the raw difference between DNAm GA and GA than on the residual from the linear regression of DNAm GA on GA. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings show that variations in the DNAm GA of the offspring at birth are associated with a number of maternal and offspring characteristics known to reflect exposure to prenatal environmental adversity. Future studies should be aimed at determining if this biological variation is predictive of developmental adversity.

◌ CITATION ONLY
Full text is not openly licensed for redistribution here. Read it at the source:

Read at source →

Provenance

Source
OpenAlex
DOI
10.1186/s13148-017-0349-z
Canonical
link ↗
Fetched
2026-07-22 MST

Cite this

APA
Girchenko, P., Lahti, J., Czamara, D., Knight, A.K., Jones, M.J., Suarez, A., Hämäläinen, E., Kajantie, E., Laivuori, H., Villa, P., Reynolds, R.M., Kobor, M.S., Smith, A.K., Binder, E.B., &amp; Räikkönen, K. (2017). Associations between maternal risk factors of adverse pregnancy and birth outcomes and the offspring epigenetic clock of gestational age at birth. <em>Clinical Epigenetics</em>. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13148-017-0349-z
Vancouver
Girchenko P, Lahti J, Czamara D, Knight AK, Jones MJ, Suarez A, et al. Associations between maternal risk factors of adverse pregnancy and birth outcomes and the offspring epigenetic clock of gestational age at birth. Clinical Epigenetics. 2017. doi:10.1186/s13148-017-0349-z.
BibTeX
@article{polina2017Associ, title = {Associations between maternal risk factors of adverse pregnancy and birth outcomes and the offspring epigenetic clock of gestational age at birth}, author = {Polina Girchenko and Jari Lahti and Darina Czamara and Anna K. Knight and Meaghan J. Jones and Anna Suarez and Esa Hämäläinen and Eero Kajantie and Hannele Laivuori and Pia Villa and Rebecca M. Reynolds and Michael S. Kobor and Alicia K. Smith and Elisabeth B. Binder and Katri Räikkönen}, journal = {Clinical Epigenetics}, year = {2017}, doi = {10.1186/s13148-017-0349-z}, }

Research neighborhood

References, citing works, and semantically nearest findings. Click a node to open it.

Related findings