Skip to content
Preprint · CC-BY via OpenAlex

A computational solution for bolstering reliability of epigenetic clocks: Implications for clinical trials and longitudinal tracking

Albert Higgins‐Chen, Kyra Thrush, Yunzhang Wang, Pei‐Lun Kuo, Meng Wang, Christopher J. Minteer, Ann Zenobia Moore, Stefania Bandinelli, Christiaan H. Vinkers, Eric Vermetten, Bart P. F. Rutten, Elbert Geuze, Cynthia Okhuijsen‐Pfeifer, Marte Z. van der Horst, Stefanie Schreiter

bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · 2021 · ▲ 43 citations

Abstract

Abstract Epigenetic clocks are widely used aging biomarkers calculated from DNA methylation data. Unfortunately, measurements for individual CpGs can be surprisingly unreliable due to technical noise, and this may limit the utility of epigenetic clocks. We report that noise produces deviations up to 3 to 9 years between technical replicates for six major epigenetic clocks. The elimination of low-reliability CpGs does not ameliorate this issue. Here, we present a novel computational multi-step solution to address this noise, involving performing principal component analysis on the CpG-level data followed by biological age prediction using principal components as input. This method extracts shared systematic variation in DNAm while minimizing random noise from individual CpGs. Our novel principal-component versions of six clocks show agreement between most technical replicates within 0 to 1.5 years, equivalent or improved prediction of outcomes, and more stable trajectories in longitudinal studies and cell culture. This method entails only one additional step compared to traditional clocks, does not require prior knowledge of CpG reliabilities, and can improve the reliability of any existing or future epigenetic biomarker. The high reliability of principal component-based epigenetic clocks will make them particularly useful for applications in personalized medicine and clinical trials evaluating novel aging interventions.

◌ CITATION ONLY
Full text is not openly licensed for redistribution here. Read it at the source:

Read at source →

Provenance

Source
OpenAlex
DOI
10.1101/2021.04.16.440205
Canonical
link ↗
Fetched
2026-07-22 MST

Cite this

APA
Higgins‐Chen, A., Thrush, K., Wang, Y., Kuo, P., Wang, M., Minteer, C.J., Moore, A.Z., Bandinelli, S., Vinkers, C.H., Vermetten, E., Rutten, B.P.F., Geuze, E., Okhuijsen‐Pfeifer, C., Horst, M.Z.V.D., Schreiter, S., Gutwinski, S., Luykx, J.J., Ferrucci, L., Crimmins, E.M., &amp; Boks, M.P. (2021). A computational solution for bolstering reliability of epigenetic clocks: Implications for clinical trials and longitudinal tracking. <em>bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)</em>. https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.04.16.440205
Vancouver
Higgins‐Chen A, Thrush K, Wang Y, Kuo P, Wang M, Minteer CJ, et al. A computational solution for bolstering reliability of epigenetic clocks: Implications for clinical trials and longitudinal tracking. bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory). 2021. doi:10.1101/2021.04.16.440205.
BibTeX
@unpublished{albert2021Acompu, title = {A computational solution for bolstering reliability of epigenetic clocks: Implications for clinical trials and longitudinal tracking}, author = {Albert Higgins‐Chen and Kyra Thrush and Yunzhang Wang and Pei‐Lun Kuo and Meng Wang and Christopher J. Minteer and Ann Zenobia Moore and Stefania Bandinelli and Christiaan H. Vinkers and Eric Vermetten and Bart P. F. Rutten and Elbert Geuze and Cynthia Okhuijsen‐Pfeifer and Marte Z. van der Horst and Stefanie Schreiter and Stefan Gutwinski and Jurjen J. Luykx and Luigi Ferrucci and Eileen M. Crimmins and Marco P. Boks and Sara Hägg and T. Hu-Seliger and Morgan E. Levine}, journal = {bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)}, year = {2021}, doi = {10.1101/2021.04.16.440205}, }

Research neighborhood

References, citing works, and semantically nearest findings. Click a node to open it.

Related findings